Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24068939›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2013

Inactivation of intergenic enhancers by EBNA3A initiates and maintains polycomb signatures across a chromatin domain encoding CXCL10 and CXCL9.

Marie L Harth-Hertle, Barbara A Scholz, Florian Erhard, Laura V Glaser, Lars Dölken, Ralf Zimmer, Bettina Kempkes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Enhancer-promoter entanglement explains their transcriptional interdependence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pathogen Evasion of Chemokine Response Through Suppression of CXCL10.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marie L Harth-HertleDepartment of Gene Vectors, Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany.
Barbara A Scholz
Florian Erhard
Laura V Glaser
Lars Dölken
Ralf Zimmer
Bettina Kempkes
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1002523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) causes a persistent infection in human B cells by establishing specific transcription programs to control B cell activation and differentiation. Transcriptional reprogramming of EBV infected B cells is predominantly driven by the action of EBV nuclear antigens, among them the transcriptional repressor EBNA3A. By comparing gene expression profiles of wt and EBNA3A negative EBV infected B cells, we have previously identified a broad array of cellular genes controlled by EBNA3A. We now find that genes repressed by EBNA3A in these cells are significantly enriched for the repressive histone mark H3K27me3, which is installed by Polycomb group (PcG) proteins. This PcG-controlled subset of genes also carries H3K27me3 marks in a variety of other tissues, suggesting that the commitment to PcG silencing is an intrinsic feature of these gene loci that can be used by EBNA3A. In addition, EBNA3A targets frequently reside in co-regulated gene clusters. To study the mechanism of gene repression by EBNA3A and to evaluate the relative contribution of PcG proteins during this process, we have selected the genomic neighbors CXCL10 and CXCL9 as a model for co-repressed and PcG-controlled genes. We show that EBNA3A binds to CBF1 occupied intergenic enhancers located between CXCL10 and CXCL9 and displaces the transactivator EBNA2. This impairs enhancer activity, resulting in a rapid transcriptional shut-down of both genes in a CBF1-dependent manner and initiation of a delayed gain of H3K27me3 marks covering an extended chromatin domain. H3K27me3 marks increase gradually and are maintained by EBNA3A. Our study provides direct evidence that repression by EBNA3A requires CBF1 and that EBNA3A and EBNA2 compete for access to CBF1 at identical genomic sites. Most importantly, our results demonstrate that transcriptional silencing by EBNA3A precedes the appearance of repressive PcG marks and indicate that both events are triggered by loss of enhancer activity.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticModels, BiologicalB-LymphocytesCell LineCellular ReprogrammingChemokine CXCL10Chemokine CXCL9Chromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNA, IntergenicEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsEpstein-Barr Virus Nuclear AntigensHerpesvirus 4, HumanHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansImmunoglobulin J Recombination Signal Sequence-Binding ProteinMutationChemokine CXCL10Chemokine CXCL9CXCL10 protein, humanCXCL9 protein, humanDNA, IntergenicEBNA-2 protein, Human herpesvirus 4EBNA-3A antigenEpstein-Barr Virus Nuclear AntigensImmunoglobulin J Recombination Signal Sequence-Binding ProteinPolycomb-Group ProteinsRBPJ protein, humanRecombinant ProteinsRepressor ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24068939
PMCPMC3777872
OpenAlexW2046980468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.