ReviewHIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)2013
An update on clinical utility of rilpivirine in the management of HIV infection in treatment-naïve patients.
Review in HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and emerging trends of drug resistance mutations in HIV: a bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Bioimaging predictors of rilpivirine biodistribution and antiretroviral activities.Biomaterials · 2018Article
- Article
- Development and validation of a simple and isocratic reversed-phase HPLC method for the determination of rilpivirine from tablets, nanoparticles and HeLa cell lysates.Biomedical chromatography : BMC · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are an important component of combination antiretroviral regimens. Amongst the NNRTIs, efavirenz is commonly recommended for initial regimens in treatment-naïve HIV patients, but its use in some settings is limited by adverse effects, particularly those affecting the central nervous system and lipid metabolism. Rilpivirine is a new second-generation NNRTI that is recommended as an alternative to efavirenz in treatment-naïve HIV patients. Evidence of the clinical efficacy of rilpivirine versus efavirenz, in combination with two nucleoside or nucleotide analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-naïve patients, is derived from the THRIVE and ECHO studies. These studies demonstrated that rilpivirine 25 mg once daily was potent and noninferior to efavirenz 600 mg once daily using an intention-to-treat time-to-loss-of-virologic-response (ITT-TLOVR) endpoint. Although virologic failure was higher in subjects treated with rilpivirine, study discontinuations due to adverse effects were more common in subjects treated with efavirenz. In addition, the virologic response to rilpivirine was suboptimal in patients with a baseline viral load >100,000 copies/mL. The overall incidence of adverse events and grade 2-4 adverse events was lower in the rilpivirine than in the efavirenz groups. Patients with rilpivirine failure were more likely to have resistance mutations that confer cross-resistance to other NNRTIs, including etravirine. Rilpivirine is currently available as a fixed-dose combination that allows for once-daily administration as a single pill, and is approved for use in treatment-naïve patients. This drug is contraindicated when co-administered with rifamycins or proton-pump inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.