Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24068571›Full record

Observational studyJournal of anesthesia2014

Incidence of postoperative delirium is high even in a population without known risk factors.

Andrea Saporito, Evelina Sturini

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of anesthesia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea SaporitoService of Anesthesiology, Bellinzona Regional Hospital, Via Ospedale 1, 6500, Bellinzona, Switzerland, saporito_andrea@hotmail.com.
Evelina Sturini
Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePostoperative delirium is a recognized complication in populations at risk. The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of early postoperative delirium in a population without known risk factors admitted to the ICU for postoperative monitoring after elective major surgery. The secondary outcome investigated is to identify eventual independent risk factors among demographic data and anesthetic drugs used.

methodsAn observational, prospective study was conducted on a consecutive cohort of patients admitted to our ICU within and for at least 24 h after major surgical procedures. Exclusion criteria were any preexisting predisposing factor for delirium or other potentially confounding neurological dysfunctions. Patients were assessed daily using the confusion assessment method for the ICU scale for 3 days after the surgical procedure. Early postoperative delirium incidence risk factors were then assessed through three different multiple regression models.

resultsAccording to the confusion assessment method for the ICU scale, 28 % of patients were diagnosed with early postoperative delirium. The use of thiopentone was significantly associated with an eight-fold-higher risk for delirium compared to propofol (57.1% vs. 7.1%, RR = 8.0, χ2 = 4.256; df = 1; 0.05 < p < 0.02).

conclusionIn this study early postoperative delirium was found to be a very common complication after major surgery, even in a population without known risk factors. Thiopentone was independently associated with an increase in its relative risk.

Indexed as

AgedAnesthesia, GeneralAnestheticsAnesthetics, CombinedDeliriumElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPropofolProspective StudiesRisk FactorsThiopentalAnestheticsAnesthetics, CombinedPropofolThiopental

Identifiers

PMID24068571
OpenAlexW2035860157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.