Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24068461›Full record

ReviewHistochemistry and cell biology2013

Golgi's way: a long path toward the new paradigm of the intra-Golgi transport.

Alexander A Mironov, Irina V Sesorova, Galina V Beznoussenko

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The 50-nm Free Vesicles Visible inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Diffusion Model of Intra-Golgi Transport Has Limited Power.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Models of Intracellular Transport: Pros and Cons.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Trans-membrane area asymmetry controls the shape of cellular organelles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Golgi compartmentation and identity.Current opinion in cell biology · 2014
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander A MironovIstituto di Oncologia Molecolare di Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, 20139, Milan, Italy, alexandre.mironov@ifom.eu.
Irina V Sesorova
Galina V Beznoussenko

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transport of proteins and lipids is one of the main cellular functions. The vesicular model, compartment (or cisterna) maturation model, and the diffusion model compete with each other for the right to be the paradigm within the field of the intra-Golgi transport. These models have significant difficulties explaining the existing experimental data. Recently, we proposed the kiss-and-run (KAR) model of intra-Golgi transport (Mironov and Beznoussenko in Int J Mol Sci 13(6):6800-6819, 2012), which can be symmetric, when fusion and fission occur in the same location, and asymmetric, when fusion and fission take place at different sites. Here, we compare the ability of main models of the intra-Golgi transport to explain the existing results examining the evidence in favor and against each model. We propose that the KAR model has the highest potential for the explanation of the majority of experimental observations existing within the field of intracellular transport.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological TransportGolgi ApparatusHumansModels, Biological

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.