Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24068359›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2013

Genetic composition of social groups influences male aggressive behaviour and fitness in natural genotypes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Julia B Saltz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evolutionary feedbacks forProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Identifying the social context of single- and mixed-species group formation in large African herbivores.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Indirect genetic effects for social network structure inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Cascading indirect genetic effects in a clonal vertebrate.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Honey bee colony aggression and indirect genetic effects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Genotype-by-genotype epistasis for exploratory behaviour inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Conservation of social effects (ΨEcology and evolution · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia B SaltzDepartment of Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, , 1050 Childs Way RRI-316, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
University of Southern California · US

Funding

Drosophila Societies: Agent-Based Analysis of Behavioral Plasticity and GeneticsR01MH100879 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MARJORAM, PAUL, NUZHDIN, SERGEY V · 2013 to 2016
$2.0M
Population Genetic Framework for Neuroanatomical Mechanisms of Behavioral ModificR01MH091561 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI NUZHDIN, SERGEY V · 2011 to 2014
$1.6M
NIMH NIH HHS MH091561NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091561NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100879NIMH NIH HHS R01MH100879 A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indirect genetic effects (IGEs) describe how an individual's behaviour-which is influenced by his or her genotype-can affect the behaviours of interacting individuals. IGE research has focused on dyads. However, insights from social networks research, and other studies of group behaviour, suggest that dyadic interactions are affected by the behaviour of other individuals in the group. To extend IGE inferences to groups of three or more, IGEs must be considered from a group perspective. Here, I introduce the 'focal interaction' approach to study IGEs in groups. I illustrate the utility of this approach by studying aggression among natural genotypes of Drosophila melanogaster. I chose two natural genotypes as 'focal interactants': the behavioural interaction between them was the 'focal interaction'. One male from each focal interactant genotype was present in every group, and I varied the genotype of the third male-the 'treatment male'. Genetic variation in the treatment male's aggressive behaviour influenced the focal interaction, demonstrating that IGEs in groups are not a straightforward extension of IGEs measured in dyads. Further, the focal interaction influenced male mating success, illustrating the role of IGEs in behavioural evolution. These results represent the first manipulative evidence for IGEs at the group level.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationSocial BehaviorAggressionAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterGenetic FitnessGenotypeLinear ModelsMaleMating Preference, AnimalObservationaggressionfruitfly (Drosophila melanogaster)IGEssexual selectionsocial behaviour

Identifiers

PMID24068359
PMCPMC3790486
OpenAlexW1987630094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.