Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24068010›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013

Comparative cost-effectiveness of two-tiered testing strategies for serodiagnosis of lyme disease with noncutaneous manifestations.

Gary P Wormser, Andrew Levin, Sandeep Soman, Omosalewa Adenikinju, Michael V Longo, John A Branda

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Paper-based pump-free magnetophoresis.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2020
    Article
  6. Diagnostic parameters of modified two-tier testing in European patients with early Lyme disease.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Modified two-tiered testing algorithm for Lyme disease serology: the Canadian context.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Advances in Serodiagnostic Testing for Lyme Disease Are at Hand.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Evaluation of Modified 2-Tiered Serodiagnostic Testing Algorithms for Early Lyme Disease.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017
    Article
  18. Lyme borreliosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Evaluation of the C6 Lyme Enzyme Immunoassay for the Diagnosis of Lyme Disease in Children and Adolescents.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gary P WormserDivision of Infectious Diseases, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Andrew Levin
Sandeep Soman
Omosalewa Adenikinju
Michael V Longo
John A Branda

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mainstay of laboratory diagnosis for Lyme disease is two-tiered serological testing, in which a reactive first-tier enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or an immunofluorescence assay is supplemented by separate IgM and IgG immunoblots. Recent data suggest that the C6 ELISA can be substituted for immunoblots without a reduction in either sensitivity or specificity. In this study, the costs of 4 different two-tiered testing strategies for Lyme disease were compared using the median charges for these tests at 6 commercial diagnostic laboratories in 2012. The study found that a whole-cell sonicate ELISA followed by the C6 ELISA was the most cost-effective two-tiered testing strategy for Lyme disease with acute-phase serum samples. We conclude that the C6 ELISA can substitute for immunoblots in the two-tiered testing protocol for Lyme disease without a loss of sensitivity or specificity and is less expensive.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansImmunoblottingLyme DiseaseSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic Tests

Identifiers

PMID24068010
PMCPMC3838032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.