Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24067446›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2013

The CCHamide 1 receptor modulates sensory perception and olfactory behavior in starved Drosophila.

Abu Farhan, Jyotasana Gulati, Ewald Groβe-Wilde, Heiko Vogel, Bill S Hansson, Markus Knaden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gut-Brain Dialogues in Fruit Fly (Current drug targets · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Nutrient Sensing via Gut inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abu FarhanDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knöll-Str. 8, 07749 Jena, Germany.
Jyotasana Gulati
Ewald Groβe-Wilde
Heiko Vogel
Bill S Hansson
Markus Knaden
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The olfactory response of the vinegar fly Drosophila melanogaster to food odor is modulated by starvation. Here we show that this modulation is not restricted to food odors and their detecting sensory neurons but rather increases the behavioral response to odors as different as food odors, repellents and pheromones. The increased behavioral responsiveness is paralleled by an increased physiological sensitivity of sensory neurons regardless whether they express olfactory or ionotropic receptors and regardless whether they are housed in basiconic, coeloconic, or trichoid sensilla. Silencing several genes that become up-regulated under starvation confirmed the involvement of the short neuropeptide f receptor in the starvation effect. In addition it revealed that the CCHamide-1 receptor is another important factor governing starvation-induced olfactory modifications.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFeeding BehaviorGenes, InsectNeuropeptidesOlfactory Receptor NeuronsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, OdorantSmellStarvationCCHa1-R protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsNeuropeptidesReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID24067446
PMCPMC3783891
OpenAlexW2071903867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.