ReviewVirulence2013
Can biowarfare agents be defeated with light?
Review in Virulence, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigation of the Effect of Ultraviolet Light Treatment on Enterobacterales and Salmonella spp. in Raw Chicken Products.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
- Sustainable Medical Materials: AI-Driven Assessment for Mechanical Performance of UVC-Treated Date Palm Epoxy Composites.Polymers · 2025Article
- New Insights Concerning Phytophotodermatitis Induced by Phototoxic Plants.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The photoactivated antifungal activity and possible mode of action of sodium pheophorbide a onFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Hybrid Radiant Disinfection: Exploring UVC and UVB Sterilization Impact on the Mechanical Characteristics of PLA Materials.Polymers · 2023Article
- Acaricidal efficacy of ultraviolet-C irradiation of Tetranychus urticae adults and eggs using a pulsed krypton fluoride excimer laser.Parasites & vectors · 2021Article
- Focus on UV-Induced DNA Damage and Repair-Disease Relevance and Protective Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Article
- Application of Laser Blue Light With a Wavelength of 405 nm in the Treatment of Patients With the Virus COVID-19.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2020Article
- Evaluation of three different decontamination techniques on biofilm formation, and on physical and chemical properties of resin composites.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2018Article
- How Prepared Are We for Possible Bioterrorist Attacks: An Approach from Emergency Medicine Perspective.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2018Review
- Bactericidal effects of 310 nm ultraviolet light-emitting diode irradiation on oral bacteria.BMC oral health · 2017Article
- Toxins as biological weapons for terror-characteristics, challenges and medical countermeasures: a mini-review.Disaster and military medicine · 2016Review
- Use of Clinical UV Chamber to Disinfect Dental Impressions: A Comparative Study.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2015Article
- Immune response after photodynamic therapy increases anti-cancer and anti-bacterial effects.World journal of immunology · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Biological warfare and bioterrorism is an unpleasant fact of 21st century life. Highly infectious and profoundly virulent diseases may be caused in combat personnel or in civilian populations by the appropriate dissemination of viruses, bacteria, spores, fungi, or toxins. Dissemination may be airborne, waterborne, or by contamination of food or surfaces. Countermeasures may be directed toward destroying or neutralizing the agents outside the body before infection has taken place, by destroying the agents once they have entered the body before the disease has fully developed, or by immunizing susceptible populations against the effects. A range of light-based technologies may have a role to play in biodefense countermeasures. Germicidal UV (UVC) is exceptionally active in destroying a wide range of viruses and microbial cells, and recent data suggests that UVC has high selectivity over host mammalian cells and tissues. Two UVA mediated approaches may also have roles to play; one where UVA is combined with titanium dioxide nanoparticles in a process called photocatalysis, and a second where UVA is combined with psoralens (PUVA) to produce "killed but metabolically active" microbial cells that may be particularly suitable for vaccines. Many microbial cells are surprisingly sensitive to blue light alone, and blue light can effectively destroy bacteria, fungi, and Bacillus spores and can treat wound infections. The combination of photosensitizing dyes such as porphyrins or phenothiaziniums and red light is called photodynamic therapy (PDT) or photoinactivation, and this approach cannot only kill bacteria, spores, and fungi, but also inactivate viruses and toxins. Many reports have highlighted the ability of PDT to treat infections and stimulate the host immune system. Finally pulsed (femtosecond) high power lasers have been used to inactivate pathogens with some degree of selectivity. We have pointed to some of the ways light-based technology may be used to defeat biological warfare in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.