ArticleIET systems biology2013
Wright-Fisher dynamics on adaptive landscape.
Article in IET systems biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Variational Synthesis of Evolutionary and Developmental Dynamics.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adaptive landscape, proposed by Sewall Wright, has provided a conceptual framework to describe dynamical behaviours. However, it is still a challenge to explicitly construct such a landscape, and apply it to quantify interesting evolutionary processes. This is particularly true for neutral evolution. In this work, the authors study one-dimensional Wright Fisher process, and analytically obtain an adaptive landscape as a potential function. They provide the complete characterisation for dynamical behaviours of all possible mutation rates under the influence of mutation and random drift. This same analysis has been applied to situations with additive selection and random drift for all possible selection rates. The critical state dividing the basins of two stable states is directly obtained by the landscape. In addition, the landscape is able to handle situations with pure random drift, which would be non-normalisable for its stationary distribution. The nature of non-normalisation is from the singularity of adaptive landscape. In addition, they propose a new type of neutral evolution. It has the same probability for all possible states. The new type of neutral evolution describes the non-neutral alleles with 0%. They take the equal effect of mutation and random drift as an example.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.