Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24067078›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2013

Testing a self-determination theory model of children's physical activity motivation: a cross-sectional study.

Simon J Sebire, Russell Jago, Kenneth R Fox, Mark J Edwards, Janice L Thompson

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 91 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03783767 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Peer Leadership for Physical Literacy: A Randomized Controlled Trial for Elementary School Students

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled359ConditionsLeadership, Physical ActivityArmsLeadership Intervention
NCT05308758 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Game-based High-Intensity Interval Training Program on the Executive Function of Children With ADHD: Protocol of A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorEducation University of Hong KongRan2021 to 2024Enrolled47ConditionsAdhd Deficits in Attention Motor Control and PerceptionArmsGame-based High-Intensity Interval Training, GameSAE
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simon J SebireCentre for Exercise Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, BS8 1TZ Bristol, United Kingdom. Simon.Sebire@bristol.ac.uk.
Russell Jago
Kenneth R Fox
Mark J Edwards
Janice L Thompson

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J000191/1Medical Research Council MR/K00414X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding children's physical activity motivation, its antecedents and associations with behavior is important and can be advanced by using self-determination theory. However, research among youth is largely restricted to adolescents and studies of motivation within certain contexts (e.g., physical education). There are no measures of self-determination theory constructs (physical activity motivation or psychological need satisfaction) for use among children and no previous studies have tested a self-determination theory-based model of children's physical activity motivation. The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of scores derived from scales adapted to measure self-determination theory constructs among children and test a motivational model predicting accelerometer-derived physical activity.

methodsCross-sectional data from 462 children aged 7 to 11 years from 20 primary schools in Bristol, UK were analysed. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the construct validity of adapted behavioral regulation and psychological need satisfaction scales. Structural equation modelling was used to test cross-sectional associations between psychological need satisfaction, motivation types and physical activity assessed by accelerometer.

resultsThe construct validity and reliability of the motivation and psychological need satisfaction measures were supported. Structural equation modelling provided evidence for a motivational model in which psychological need satisfaction was positively associated with intrinsic and identified motivation types and intrinsic motivation was positively associated with children's minutes in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.

conclusionsThe study provides evidence for the psychometric properties of measures of motivation aligned with self-determination theory among children. Children's motivation that is based on enjoyment and inherent satisfaction of physical activity is associated with their objectively-assessed physical activity and such motivation is positively associated with perceptions of psychological need satisfaction. These psychological factors represent potential malleable targets for interventions to increase children's physical activity.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalMotor ActivityPersonal AutonomyAccelerometryAdaptation, PsychologicalChildCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMotivationPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSchoolsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID24067078
PMCPMC3852537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.