Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24067062›Full record

SynthesisBMC nephrology2013

Difference in blood pressure response to ACE-Inhibitor monotherapy between black and white adults with arterial hypertension: a meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials.

Robert N Peck, Luke R Smart, Rita Beier, Anthony C Liwa, Heiner Grosskurth, Daniel W Fitzgerald, Bernhard M W Schmidt

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC nephrology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Is the response to antihypertensive drugs heterogeneous? Rationale for personalized approach.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Robert N PeckDepartment of Medicine, Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania. rnp2002@gmail.com.
Luke R Smart
Rita Beier
Anthony C Liwa
Heiner Grosskurth
Daniel W Fitzgerald
Bernhard M W Schmidt
Bugando Medical Centre · TZCenter for Global Health · USCornell University · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

Vanderbilt-Emory-Cornell-Duke Consortium for Global Health Fellows (VECDor)R25TW009337 · FIC · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI HEIMBURGER, DOUGLAS CORBETT, VERMUND, STEN H. · 2012 to 2016
$6.3M
Global Health Research Training in HIV and TuberculosisK24AI098627 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI FITZGERALD, DANIEL W · 2012 to 2022
$1.8M
FIC NIH HHS R25 TW009337Medical Research Council G1002650NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI098627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong African-Americans adults, arterial hypertension is both more prevalent and associated with more complications than among white adults. Hypertension is also epidemic among black adults in sub-Saharan Africa. The treatment of hypertension among black adults may be complicated by lesser response to certain classes of anti-hypertensive agents.

methodsWe systematically searched literature for clinical trials of ACE-inhibitors among hypertensive adults comparing blood pressure response between whites and blacks. Meta-analysis was performed to determine the difference in systolic and diastolic blood pressure response. Further analysis including meta-regressions, funnel plots, and one-study-removed analyses were performed to investigate possible sources of heterogeneity or bias.

resultsIn a meta-analysis of 13 trials providing 17 different patient groups for evaluation, black race was associated with a lesser reduction in systolic (mean difference: 4.6 mmHg (95% CI 3.5-5.7)) and diastolic (mean difference: 2.8 mmHg (95% CI 2.2-3.5)) blood pressure response to ACE-inhibitors, with little heterogeneity. Meta-regression revealed only ACE-inhibitor dosage as a significant source of heterogeneity. There was little evidence of publication bias.

conclusionsBlack race is consistently associated with a clinically significant lesser reduction in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure to ACE-inhibitor therapy in clinical trials in the USA and Europe. In black adults requiring monotherapy for uncomplicated hypertension, drugs other than ACE-inhibitors may be preferred, though the proven benefits of ACE-inhibitors in some sub-groups and the large overlap of response between blacks and whites must be remembered. These data are particularly important for interpretation of clinical drug trials for hypertensive black adults in sub-Saharan Africa and for the development of treatment recommendations in this population.

Indexed as

AdultAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsBlack or African AmericanClinical Trials as TopicEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansHypertensionMalePrevalenceRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeWhite PeopleAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID24067062
PMCPMC3849838
OpenAlexW2159740834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.