ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2014
Implantation of in vitro tissue engineered muscle repair constructs and bladder acellular matrices partially restore in vivo skeletal muscle function in a rat model of volumetric muscle loss injury.
Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
92 citing papers in PubMed, 141 citations in OpenAlex.
- Injectable chondroitin sulfate-glycosylated decellularized extracellular matrix microgels activate Wnt/β-Catenin signaling to promote functional muscle regeneration in VML.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Duchenne muscular dystrophy: from gene to gene-ius therapies.Skeletal muscle · 2026Review
- Biomimetic Scaffolds and Extracellular Matrix-Based Strategies for Myofiber Regeneration in Volumetric Muscle Loss.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Extracellular matrix in skeletal muscle injury and atrophy: mechanisms and therapeutic implications.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Review
- Freeze-Dried Porous Collagen Scaffolds for the Repair of Volumetric Muscle Loss Injuries.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- CNanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Article
- Cell-scale porosity minimizes foreign body reaction and promotes innervated myofiber formation after volumetric muscle loss.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2025Article
- In Sequence Antifibrotic Treatment and Rehabilitation after Volumetric Muscle Loss Injury.Advances in wound care · 2025Article
- Current Methodologies for Inducing Aligned Myofibers in Tissue Constructs for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Regeneration.Advances in wound care · 2025Review
- Extrusion-Based Printing of Myoblast-Loaded Fibrin Microthreads to Induce Myogenesis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Freeze-dried porous collagen scaffolds for the repair of volumetric muscle loss injuries.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Enhancing volumetric muscle loss (VML) recovery in a rat model using super durable hydrogels derived from bacteria.Bioactive materials · 2024Article
- Engineering Stem Cell Fate Controlling Biomaterials to Develop Muscle Connective Tissue Layered Myofibers.Advanced functional materials · 2024Article
- Nano-biomaterials and advanced fabrication techniques for engineering skeletal muscle tissue constructs in regenerative medicine.Nano convergence · 2023Review
- Long-term longitudinal study on swine VML model.Biology direct · 2023Article
- Transcriptome profiling of a synergistic volumetric muscle loss repair strategy.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- 3D human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived bioengineered skeletal muscles for tissue, disease and therapy modeling.Nature protocols · 2023Review
- Local IL-10 delivery modulates the immune response and enhances repair of volumetric muscle loss muscle injury.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Comprehensive dynamic and kinematic analysis of the rodent hindlimb during over ground walking.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Controlling scaffold conductivity and pore size to direct myogenic cell alignment and differentiation.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2022Article
32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The frank loss of a large volume of skeletal muscle (i.e., volumetric muscle loss [VML]) can lead to functional debilitation and presents a significant problem to civilian and military medicine. Current clinical treatment for VML involves the use of free muscle flaps and physical rehabilitation; however, neither are effective in promoting regeneration of skeletal muscle to replace the tissue that was lost. Toward this end, skeletal muscle tissue engineering therapies have recently shown great promise in offering an unprecedented treatment option for VML. In the current study, we further extend our recent progress (Machingal et al., 2011, Tissue Eng; Corona et al., 2012, Tissue Eng) in the development of tissue engineered muscle repair (TEMR) constructs (i.e., muscle-derived cells [MDCs] seeded on a bladder acellular matrix (BAM) preconditioned with uniaxial mechanical strain) for the treatment of VML. TEMR constructs were implanted into a VML defect in a tibialis anterior (TA) muscle of Lewis rats and observed up to 12 weeks postinjury. The salient findings of the study were (1) TEMR constructs exhibited a highly variable capacity to restore in vivo function of injured TA muscles, wherein TEMR-positive responders (n=6) promoted an ≈61% improvement, but negative responders (n=7) resulted in no improvement compared to nonrepaired controls, (2) TEMR-positive and -negative responders exhibited differential immune responses that may underlie these variant responses, (3) BAM scaffolds (n=7) without cells promoted an ≈26% functional improvement compared to uninjured muscles, (4) TEMR-positive responders promoted muscle fiber regeneration within the initial defect area, while BAM scaffolds did so only sparingly. These findings indicate that TEMR constructs can improve the in vivo functional capacity of the injured musculature at least, in part, by promoting generation of functional skeletal muscle fibers. In short, the degree of functional recovery observed following TEMR implantation (BAM+MDCs) was 2.3×-fold greater than that observed following implantation of BAM alone. As such, this finding further underscores the potential benefits of including a cellular component in the tissue engineering strategy for VML injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.