ArticleBMC family practice2013
The safety netting behaviour of first contact clinicians: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC family practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Drivers for inappropriate fever management in children: a systematic review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2016Pooled it
- Should all acutely ill children in primary care be tested with point-of-care CRP: a cluster randomised trial.BMC medicine · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Safety netting advice for acutely ill children presenting to ambulatory care: exploring parents' opinions, ideas, and expectations through focus group interviews.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Safety-netting advice documentation in out-of-hours primary care: a retrospective cohort from 2013 to 2020.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Article
- Fatigue as main symptom in an elderly multiple myeloma patient: a Case Report.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Role of communicating diagnostic uncertainty in the safety-netting process: insights from a vignette study.BMJ quality & safety · 2024Article
- How is diagnostic uncertainty communicated and managed in real world primary care settings?BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Safety-netting strategies for primary and emergency care: a codesign study with patients, carers and clinicians in Sweden.BMJ open · 2024Article
- What is important to the GP in recognizing acute appendicitis in children: a delphi study.BMC primary care · 2023Review
- Patients' and clinicians' views on the appropriate use of safety-netting advice in consultations-an interview study from Sweden.BMJ open · 2023Article
- SAFETY NETTING CONCEPT IN PRIMARY CARE CONSULTATION.Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine · 2023Article
- Safety netting advice for respiratory tract infections in out-of-hours primary care: A qualitative analysis of consultation videos.The European journal of general practice · 2022Article
- Navigating uncertain illness trajectories for young children with serious infectious illness: a modified grounded theory study.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Harnessing the Electronic Health Care Record to Optimize Patient Safety in Primary Care: Framework for Evaluating e-Safety-Netting Tools.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- Optimising GPs' communication of advice to facilitate patients' self-care and prompt follow-up when the diagnosis is uncertain: a realist review of 'safety-netting' in primary care.BMJ quality & safety · 2022Review
- The person-based development and realist evaluation of a summary report for GP consultations [version 1; peer review: 2 approved].NIHR open research · 2022Article
- Factors affecting the documentation of spoken safety-netting advice in routine GP consultations: a cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021Article
- Safety netting in routine primary care consultations: an observational study using video-recorded UK consultations.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute illness is common in childhood, and it is difficult for healthcare professionals to distinguish seriously ill children from the vast majority with minor or self-limiting illnesses. Safety netting provides parents with advice on when and where to return if their child deteriorates, and it is widely recommended that parents of acutely sick young children should be given safety netting advice. Yet little is known about how and when this is given. We aimed to understand what safety netting advice first contact clinicians give parents of acutely sick young children, how, when, and why.
methodsThis was a qualitative study. Interviews and focus groups were held with doctors and nurses in a general practice surgery, a District General Hospital emergency department, a paediatric emergency department, and an out-of-hours service. Data were analysed using the method of constant comparison.
resultsSixteen clinicians participated. They described that safety netting advice includes advising parents what to look for, when and where to seek help. How safety netting was delivered and whether it was verbal or written was inconsistent, and no participants described being trained in this area. Safety netting appeared to be rarely documented, and was left to individual preference. Limitations of written materials, and structural barriers to the provision of safety netting, were perceived. Participants described that safety netting was influenced by clinicians' experience, confidence, time and knowledge; and perceived parental anxiety, experience, and competence. Participants noted several limitations to safety netting including not knowing if it has been understood by parents or been effective; parental difficulty interpreting information and desire for face-to-face reassurance; and potential over-reassurance.
conclusionFirst contact clinicians employ a range of safety netting techniques, with inconsistencies within and between organisations. Structural changes, clinician training, and documentation in patient notes may improve safety netting provision. Research is needed into the optimal components of safety netting advice so that clinicians can consistently deliver the most effective advice for parents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.