Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24066613›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2013

Biochar and microbial signaling: production conditions determine effects on microbial communication.

Caroline A Masiello, Ye Chen, Xiaodong Gao, Shirley Liu, Hsiao-Ying Cheng, Matthew R Bennett, Jennifer A Rudgers, Daniel S Wagner, Kyriacos Zygourakis, Jonathan J Silberg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
19.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 218 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Enhancement byPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Sorption characteristics ofRSC advances · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caroline A MasielloDepartment of Earth Science, ‡Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, §Department of Bioengineering, and ¶Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Rice University , 6100 Main Street, Houston, Texas 77005, United States.
Ye Chen
Xiaodong Gao
Shirley Liu
Hsiao-Ying Cheng
Matthew R Bennett
Jennifer A Rudgers
Daniel S Wagner
Kyriacos Zygourakis
Jonathan J Silberg
University of New Mexico · US

Funding

Experimental and mathematical analysis of delay in transcripitional signalingR01GM104974 · NIGMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI BENNETT, MATTHEW R. · 2012 to 2016
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104974NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM104974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Charcoal has a long soil residence time, which has resulted in its production and use as a carbon sequestration technique (biochar). A range of biological effects can be triggered by soil biochar that can positively and negatively influence carbon storage, such as changing the decomposition rate of organic matter and altering plant biomass production. Sorption of cellular signals has been hypothesized to underlie some of these effects, but it remains unknown whether the binding of biochemical signals occurs, and if so, on time scales relevant to microbial growth and communication. We examined biochar sorption of N-3-oxo-dodecanoyl-L-homoserine lactone, an acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) intercellular signaling molecule used by many gram-negative soil microbes to regulate gene expression. We show that wood biochars disrupt communication within a growing multicellular system that is made up of sender cells that synthesize AHL and receiver cells that express green fluorescent protein in response to an AHL signal. However, biochar inhibition of AHL-mediated cell-cell communication varied, with the biochar prepared at 700 °C (surface area of 301 m(2)/g) inhibiting cellular communication 10-fold more than an equivalent mass of biochar prepared at 300 °C (surface area of 3 m(2)/g). These findings provide the first direct evidence that biochars elicit a range of effects on gene expression dependent on intercellular signaling, implicating the method of biochar preparation as a parameter that could be tuned to regulate microbial-dependent soil processes, like nitrogen fixation and pest attack of root crops.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAcyl-ButyrolactonesAdsorptionBacteriaCharcoalGenes, ReporterGreen Fluorescent ProteinsTemperatureAcyl-ButyrolactonesbiocharCharcoalGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24066613
PMCPMC3897159
OpenAlexW2146709745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.