Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24066145›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

Patient navigation and time to diagnostic resolution: results for a cluster randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of patient navigation among patients with breast cancer screening abnormalities, Tampa, FL.

Ji-Hyun Lee, William Fulp, Kristen J Wells, Cathy D Meade, Ercilia Calcano, Richard Roetzheim

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00375024 (Patient Navigator Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00375024 nacompletednot on this map

Patient Navigator Project

TypeinterventionalSponsorH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteRan2007 to 2012Enrolled1,267ConditionsBreast Cancer, Colon CancerArmsPatient Navigation, Clinic Staff
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Application of patient navigation programs across the entire continuum of breast cancer care: a GRADE-assessed systematic review with meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Adherence in the Cancer Care Setting: a Systematic Review of Patient Navigation to Traverse Barriers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Establishing effective patient navigation programs in oncology.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Effect of patient navigation on satisfaction with cancer-related care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Association of patient-provider communication domains with lung cancer treatment.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2014
    Article
  19. Effect of patient navigation on time to diagnostic resolution among patients with colorectal cancer-related abnormalities.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2014
    Article
  20. Patient Navigation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ji-Hyun LeeH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, United States of America ; University of South Florida, College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, United States of America.
William Fulp
Kristen J Wells
Cathy D Meade
Ercilia Calcano
Richard Roetzheim
Florida College · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USSan Diego State University · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI Christine O'Connell · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
Training ProgramU54CA153509 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI GWEDE, CLEMENT K., MEADE, CATHY D. · 2010 to 2015
$4.8M
Behavioral Oncology Education & Career DevelopmentR25CA090314 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR &RES INST · PI BRANDON, THOMAS H · 2003 to 2018
$4.0M
Tampa Bay Community Cancer Network (TB-CCN): A Model fo*U01CA114627 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR &RES INST · PI MEADE, CATHY D. · 2005 to 2009
$3.5M
Patient Navigator ProgramU01CA117281 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR &RES INST · PI ROETZHEIM, RICHARD G · 2005 to 2009
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NCI NIH HHS R25 CA090314NCI NIH HHS U01 CA114627NCI NIH HHS U01 CA117281NCI NIH HHS U01 CA 117281-01NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate a patient navigation (PN) program that attempts to reduce the time between a breast cancer screening abnormality and definitive diagnosis among medically underserved populations of Tampa Bay, Florida.

methodsThe Moffitt Patient Navigation Research Program conducted a cluster randomized design with 10 primary care clinics. Patients were navigated from time of a breast screening abnormality to diagnostic resolution. This paper examined the length of time between breast abnormality and definitive diagnosis, using a shared frailty Cox proportional hazard model to assess PN program effect.

results1,039 patients were eligible for the study because of an abnormal breast cancer screening/clinical abnormality (494 navigated; 545 control). Analysis of PN effect by two time periods of resolution (0-3 months and > 3 months) showed a lagged effect of PN. For patients resolving in the first three months, the adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) was 0.85 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.64-1.13) suggesting that PN had no effect on resolution time during this period. Beyond three months, however, navigated patients resolved more quickly to diagnostic resolution compared with the control group (aHR 2.8, 95%CI: 1.30-6.13). The predicted aHR at 3 months was 1.2, which was not statistically significant, while PN had a significant positive effect beyond 4.7 months.

conclusionsPN programs may increase the timeliness of diagnostic resolution for patients with a breast cancer-related abnormality. PN did not speed diagnostic resolution during the initial three months of follow up but started to reduce time to diagnostic resolution after three months and showed a significant effect after 4.7 months.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00375024.

Indexed as

Patient NavigationAdultBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID24066145
PMCPMC3774725
OpenAlexW2005543239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.