ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2013
Evaluation of the success criteria for zirconia dental implants: a four-year clinical and radiological study.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of the clinical survival of zirconia implants.Clinical oral investigations · 2016Pooled it
- A prospective clinical study to evaluate the performance of zirconium dioxide dental implants in single-tooth edentulous area: 3-year follow-up.BMC oral health · 2018Trial
- Tensile Retention of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Crowns Cemented to One-Piece Zirconia Implants: A Pilot In Vitro Study of Cementation Protocol, Resin Cement, and Micro-CT Cement Morphology.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Long-Term Stability of Hydrothermally Aged and/or Dynamically Loaded One-Piece Diameter Reduced Zirconia Oral Implants.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Results at the 1-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective Cohort Study with Short, Zirconia Implants.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Success and patient satisfaction of immediately loaded zirconia implants with fixed restorations one year after loading.BMC oral health · 2022Article
- Surface Structure of Zirconia Implants: An Integrative Review Comparing Clinical Results with Preclinical and In Vitro Data.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Zirconia Dental Implants-A Clinical Case Series Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Immediate Restoration of Single-Piece Zirconia Implants: A Prospective Case Series-Long-Term Results after 11 Years of Clinical Function.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Zirconium dioxide implants as an alternative to titanium: A systematic review.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2021Review
- Single tooth restoration in the maxillary esthetic zone using a one-piece ceramic implant with 1 year of follow-up: case series.International journal of implant dentistry · 2021Article
- A Critical Review of Dental Implant Materials with an Emphasis on TitaniumMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Review
- Zirconia Implants in Esthetic Areas: 4-Year Follow-Up Evaluation Study.International journal of dentistry · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives. The aim was to evaluate survival and success rates, soft tissue health, and radiographic marginal bone loss (MBL) of zirconia implants placed in the esthetic and posterior areas of the jaws and in association with multiple or single implant restorations after at least 6 months of definitive restoration. Material and Methods. 35 one-piece zirconium implants were utilized for single or partially edentulous ridges rehabilitation. All implants received immediate temporary restorations and six months after surgery were definitively restored. Every 6 months after implant placement, a clinical-radiographic evaluation was performed. For each radiograph, the measurements of MBL were calculated. Results. The results showed that the mean MBL at 48-month followup was 1.631 mm. The mean MBL during the first year of loading was not more significant for implants placed in the first molar regions than for those positioned in other areas. Moreover, no differences in marginal bone level changes were revealed for multiple and single implants, whereas MBL in the first year was observed to be slightly greater for implants placed in the maxilla than for those placed in the mandible. Conclusion. Zirconia showed a good marginal bone preservation that could be correlated with one-piece morphology and characteristics of zirconia implants.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.