Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24065821›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013

Diagnostic leukapheresis enables reliable detection of circulating tumor cells of nonmetastatic cancer patients.

Johannes C Fischer, Dieter Niederacher, Stefan A Topp, Ellen Honisch, Sarah Schumacher, Norma Schmitz, Luisa Zacarias Föhrding, Christian Vay, Imke Hoffmann, Nikola S Kasprowicz and 16 more

Abstract readEvaluation StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 123 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Label-Free Microfluidic Apheresis of Circulating Tumor Cell Clusters.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Johannes C FischerInstitute for Transplantation Diagnostics and Cell Therapeutics and Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, Medical Faculty, University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Dieter Niederacher
Stefan A Topp
Ellen Honisch
Sarah Schumacher
Norma Schmitz
Luisa Zacarias Föhrding
Christian Vay
Imke Hoffmann
Nikola S Kasprowicz
Philip G Hepp
Svjetlana Mohrmann
Ulrike Nitz
Antje Stresemann
Thomas Krahn
Tanja Henze
Evelyn Griebsch
Katharina Raba
Jutta M Rox
Folker Wenzel
Christoph Sproll
Wolfgang Janni
Tanja Fehm
Christoph A Klein
Wolfram Trudo Knoefel
Nikolas H Stoecklein

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are promising biomarkers for diagnosis and therapy in systemic cancer. However, their infrequent and unreliable detection, especially in nonmetastatic cancer, currently impedes the clinical use of CTCs. Because leukapheresis (LA) targets peripheral blood mononuclear cells, which have a similar density to CTCs, and usually involves processing the whole circulating blood, we tested whether LA could substantially increase CTC detection in operable cancer patients. Therefore, we screened LA products generated from up to 25 L of blood per patient in two independent studies, and found that CTCs can be detected in more than 90% of nonmetastatic breast cancer patients. Interestingly, complete white blood cell sampling enabled determining an upper level for total CTC numbers of about 100,000 cells (median, 7,500 CTCs) per patient and identified a correlation of CTC numbers with anatomic disease spread. We further show that diagnostic leukapheresis can be easily combined with the US Food and Drug Administration-approved CellSearch system for standardized enumeration of CTCs. Direct comparison with 7.5 mL of blood revealed a significantly higher CTC frequency in matched LA samples. Finally, genomic single-cell profiling disclosed highly aberrant CTCs as therapy-escaping variants in breast cancer. In conclusion, LA is a clinically safe method that enabled a reliable detection of CTCs at high frequency even in nonmetastatic cancer patients, and might facilitate the routine clinical use of CTCs as in the sense of a liquid biopsy. Combined with technologies for single-cell molecular genetics or cell biology, it may significantly improve prediction of therapy response and monitoring of early systemic cancer.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques and ProceduresBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesComparative Genomic HybridizationFemaleGermanyHumansLeukapheresisNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesStatistics, NonparametricBiomarkers, Tumorcomparative genomic hybridizationgastrointestinal cancermetastasisminimal residual diseasesingle-cell analysis

Identifiers

PMID24065821
PMCPMC3799344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.