Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24065806›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2013

Episcleral venous pressure and IOP responses to central electrical stimulation in the rat.

Clemens A Strohmaier, Herbert A Reitsamer, Jeffrey W Kiel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Transcorneal electrical stimulation in primary open angle glaucoma].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2017
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Modeling and finite element analysis of human trabecular meshwork outflow pathways].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Vascular Aspects in Glaucoma: From Pathogenesis to Therapeutic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Aqueous Humor Dynamics of the Brown-Norway Rat.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Autonomic control of the eye.Comprehensive Physiology · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Clemens A StrohmaierDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Herbert A Reitsamer
Jeffrey W Kiel
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USParacelsus Medical University · AT

Funding

Ocular blood flow and intraocular pressure homeostasisR01EY009702 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI KIEL, JEFFREY W · 1992 to 2013
$3.3M
NEI NIH HHS EY009702NEI NIH HHS R01 EY009702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHistological evidence suggests a role for the central nervous system in controlling episcleral venous pressure (EVP). Based on prior studies that identified candidate regions in the brain stem, the present study assessed the effect of electrical stimulation at the location of the superior salivatory nucleus (SSN) on EVP in rats.

methodsMale Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 11) were anesthetized using pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg intraperitoneally initially, supplemented intravenously [IV] as needed) and paralyzed with gallamine triethiodide (1 mg/kg, IV). The animals were artificially ventilated and the femoral artery and vein were cannulated for blood pressure measurement and drug administration. Carotid blood flow was measured with an ultrasound flow probe and heart rate with a cardiotachometer. IOP was measured through a cannula in the vitreous compartment and EVP was measured through a micropipette in episcleral veins using the servonull technique. After a craniotomy was performed, a unipolar stainless steel electrode was inserted into the brainstem at the coordinates of the SSN using a stereotactic instrument. Stimulations were performed at 20Hz, 9 μA, 1 ms pulse duration, and 200 pulses.

resultsStimulation at the SSN coordinates increased IOP from 10.6 ± 0.4 to 11.8 ± 0.6 mm Hg (P < 0.01) and EVP from 7.8 ± 1.3 to 10.7 ± 1.1 mm Hg (P < 0.01). Mean arterial pressure, carotid blood flow, and heart rate remained unaltered.

conclusionsThe present study indicates that the SSN may participate in regulating EVP.

Indexed as

Electric StimulationAnimalsHypothalamusIntraocular PressureMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyScleraVenous Pressureepiscleral venous pressureIOPstimulationsuperior salivatory nucleus

Identifiers

PMID24065806
PMCPMC3805088
OpenAlexW2048101516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.