Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24065123›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2014

Novel risk factors for lymph node metastasis in early invasive colorectal cancer: a multi-institution pathology review.

Hideki Ueno, Kazuo Hase, Yojiro Hashiguchi, Hideyuki Shimazaki, Shinji Yoshii, Shin-ei Kudo, Masafumi Tanaka, Yoshito Akagi, Takeshi Suto, Shinji Nagata and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Clinical Practice Guideline for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2020
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Recommendations for reporting tumor budding in colorectal cancer based on the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2017
    Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Local excision for T1 rectal cancer: A population-based study of practice patterns and oncological outcomes.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Hideki UenoDepartment of Surgery, National Defense Medical College, 3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-8513, Japan, ueno@ndmc.ac.jp.
Kazuo Hase
Yojiro Hashiguchi
Hideyuki Shimazaki
Shinji Yoshii
Shin-ei Kudo
Masafumi Tanaka
Yoshito Akagi
Takeshi Suto
Shinji Nagata
Keiji Matsuda
Koji Komori
Kazuhiko Yoshimatsu
Yasuhiko Tomita
Shozo Yokoyama
Eiji Shinto
Takahiro Nakamura
Kenichi Sugihara
National Defense Medical College · JPTeikyo University · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPHiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital · JPKeiyukai Sapporo Hospital · JPKurume University · JPOsaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases · JPShowa University Northern Yokohama Hospital · JPTakano Hospital · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPTokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical Center · JPWakayama Medical University · JPYamagata Prefectural Central Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNovel risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) have been recently proposed, but most have not been implemented because of the lack of validation. Here we determined the value of poorly differentiated clusters (PDCs) in a multi-institutional cohort of T1 CRC cases.

methodsA pathology review involving 30 institutions was conducted for 3556 T1 CRCs. PDC was defined as malignant clusters comprising ≥5 cells and lacking a glandular formation. The ability to identify LNM risk was compared using Akaike's information criterion (AIC).

resultsPDC was observed in 1401 tumors (39.4 %), including 94 (17.8 %) with <1000 µm submucosal invasion and 1307 (43.2 %) with ≥1000 µm submucosal invasion (P < 0.0001). The incidence of LNM was higher in PDC-positive tumors (17.4 %) than in PDC-negative tumors (6.9 %; P < 0.0001), and PDCs had an adverse impact on LNM irrespective of the degree of submucosal invasion. Grade 3, vascular invasion, budding, and submucosal invasion depth were also significant factors (all, P < 0.0001). AIC of risk factor to identify LNM risk was most favorable for vascular invasion (2273.4), followed by PDC (2357.4); submucosal invasion depth (2429.1) was the most unfavorable. Interinstitutional judgment disparities were smaller in PDC (kappa, 0.51) than vascular invasion (0.33) or tumor grade (0.48).

conclusionsPDC is a promising new parameter with good ability to identify LNM risk. Use of its appropriate judgment criteria will enable us determine whether an observational policy can be safely applied following local tumor excision in T1 CRC cases.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIncidenceLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessRisk FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24065123
OpenAlexW2167324555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.