Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24064468›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2014

A new algorithm for predicting time to disease endpoints in Alzheimer's disease patients.

Qolamreza R Razlighi, Eric Stallard, Jason Brandt, Deborah Blacker, Marilyn Albert, Nikolaos Scarmeas, Bruce Kinosian, Anatoliy I Yashin, Yaakov Stern

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Validation and demonstration of a new comprehensive model of Alzheimer's disease progression.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Predictors study: Development and baseline characteristics of the Predictors 3 cohort.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Qolamreza R RazlighiCognitive Neuroscience Division, Department of Neurology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Eric Stallard
Jason Brandt
Deborah Blacker
Marilyn Albert
Nikolaos Scarmeas
Bruce Kinosian
Anatoliy I Yashin
Yaakov Stern
Columbia University · USDuke University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USPhiladelphia VA Medical Center · USSocial Science Research Council · USThe Mountain Institute · US

Funding

'T V ASSESSMENT - MEMORY DISORDERED PATIENTS'P50AG005146 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HUGANIR, RICHARD L · 1985 to 2019
$37.6M
PREDICTORS OF SEVERITY IN ALZHEIMERS DISEASER01AG007370 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI STERN, YAAKOV · 1989 to 2021
$16.6M
Analyzing age-related changes of brain activation in subjects native spaceK01AG044467 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RAZLIGHI, QOLAMREZA RAY · 2013 to 2017
$636k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG044467NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005146NIA NIH HHS R01 AG007370NIA NIH HHS R01-AG07370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ability to predict the length of time to death and institutionalization has strong implications for Alzheimer's disease patients and caregivers, health policy, economics, and the design of intervention studies.

objectiveTo develop and validate a prediction algorithm that uses data from a single visit to estimate time to important disease endpoints for individual Alzheimer's disease patients.

methodTwo separate study cohorts (Predictors 1, N = 252; Predictors 2, N = 254), all initially with mild Alzheimer's disease, were followed for 10 years at three research centers with semiannual assessments that included cognition, functional capacity, and medical, psychiatric, and neurologic information. The prediction algorithm was based on a longitudinal Grade of Membership model developed using the complete series of semiannually-collected Predictors 1 data. The algorithm was validated on the Predictors 2 data using data only from the initial assessment to predict separate survival curves for three outcomes.

resultsFor each of the three outcome measures, the predicted survival curves fell well within the 95% confidence intervals of the observed survival curves. Patients were also divided into quintiles for each endpoint to assess the calibration of the algorithm for extreme patient profiles. In all cases, the actual and predicted survival curves were statistically equivalent. Predictive accuracy was maintained even when key baseline variables were excluded, demonstrating the high resilience of the algorithm to missing data.

conclusionThe new prediction algorithm accurately predicts time to death, institutionalization, and need for full-time care in individual Alzheimer's disease patients; it can be readily adapted to predict other important disease endpoints. The algorithm will serve an unmet clinical, research, and public health need.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseCohort StudiesFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSex FactorsTime FactorsAlzheimer's diseasefull-time caregrade of membership modelnursing homeprediction algorithmtime to death

Identifiers

PMID24064468
PMCPMC3864687
OpenAlexW2169412570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.