Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24064443›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Sociotechnical challenges to developing technologies for patient access to health information exchange data.

Jessica S Ancker, Melissa C Miller, Vaishali Patel, Rainu Kaushal, HITEC Investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Guidance for publishing qualitative research in informatics.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Falling short: how state laws can address health information exchange barriers and enablers.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
  13. Linking the health data system in the U.S.: Challenges to the benefits.International journal of nursing sciences · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica S AnckerWeill Cornell Medical College, Center for Healthcare Informatics and Policy, New York, New York, USA Health Information Technology Evaluation Collaborative (HITEC), New York, New York, USA.
Melissa C MillerWeill Cornell Medical College, Center for Healthcare Informatics and Policy, New York, New York, USA Health Information Technology Evaluation Collaborative (HITEC), New York, New York, USA.
Vaishali PatelDepartment of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Washington, DC, USA.
Rainu KaushalWeill Cornell Medical College, Center for Healthcare Informatics and Policy, New York, New York, USA Health Information Technology Evaluation Collaborative (HITEC), New York, New York, USA.
HITEC Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding patients with access to their medical data is widely expected to help educate and empower them to manage their own health. Health information exchange (HIE) infrastructures could potentially help patients access records across multiple healthcare providers. We studied three HIE organizations as they developed portals to give consumers access to HIE data previously exchanged only among healthcare organizations.

objectiveTo follow the development of new consumer portal technologies, and to identify barriers and facilitators to patient access to HIE data.

methodsSemistructured interviews of 15 key informants over a 2-year period spanning the development and early implementation of three new projects, coded according to a sociotechnical framework.

resultsAs the organizations tried to develop functionality that fully served the needs of both providers and patients, plans were altered by technical barriers (primarily related to data standardization) and cultural and legal issues surrounding data access. Organizational changes also played an important role in altering project plans. In all three cases, patient access to data was significantly scaled back from initial plans.

conclusionsThis prospective study revealed how sociotechnical factors previously identified as important in health information technology success and failure helped to shape the evolution of three novel consumer informatics projects. Barriers to providing patients with seamless access to their HIE data were multifactorial. Remedies will have to address technical, organizational, cultural, and other factors.

Indexed as

Consumer Health InformationElectronic Health RecordsPatient Access to RecordsComputer LiteracyHumansInterviews as TopicMedical InformaticsMedical Record LinkageProspective StudiesSociology, MedicalConsumer health informaticsElectronic health recordsHealth information exchangeImplementation researchPersonal health recordsQualitative methods

Identifiers

PMID24064443
PMCPMC4078272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.