ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013
A modular framework for biomedical concept recognition.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Accurate and Efficient Approach to Knowledge Extraction from Scientific Publications Using Structured Ontology Models, Graph Neural Networks, and Large Language Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Federated analysis of autosomal recessive coding variants in 29,745 developmental disorder patients from diverse populations.Nature genetics · 2024Article
- An automatic hypothesis generation for plausible linkage between xanthium and diabetes.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Parallel sequence tagging for concept recognition.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- MedTAG: a portable and customizable annotation tool for biomedical documents.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Extraction of Family History Information From Clinical Notes: Deep Learning and Heuristics Approach.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Article
- Towards reliable named entity recognition in the biomedical domain.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Extraction of chemical-protein interactions from the literature using neural networks and narrow instance representation.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019Article
- Configurable web-services for biomedical document annotation.Journal of cheminformatics · 2018Article
- Exploiting and assessing multi-source data for supervised biomedical named entity recognition.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Chronic lifestyle diseases display seasonal sensitive comorbid trend in human population evidence from Google Trends.PloS one · 2018Article
- Gene ontology concept recognition using named concept: understanding the various presentations of the gene functions in biomedical literature.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018Article
- Entity recognition in the biomedical domain using a hybrid approach.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2017Article
- A method for named entity normalization in biomedical articles: application to diseases and plants.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Semantic annotation in biomedicine: the current landscape.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2017Review
- Medical diagnosis as a linguistic game.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2017Article
- A semantic-based workflow for biomedical literature annotation.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2017Article
- Gold-standard ontology-based anatomical annotation in the CRAFT Corpus.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2017Article
- TaggerOne: joint named entity recognition and normalization with semi-Markov Models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
- Gene Ontology synonym generation rules lead to increased performance in biomedical concept recognition.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConcept recognition is an essential task in biomedical information extraction, presenting several complex and unsolved challenges. The development of such solutions is typically performed in an ad-hoc manner or using general information extraction frameworks, which are not optimized for the biomedical domain and normally require the integration of complex external libraries and/or the development of custom tools.
resultsThis article presents Neji, an open source framework optimized for biomedical concept recognition built around four key characteristics: modularity, scalability, speed, and usability. It integrates modules for biomedical natural language processing, such as sentence splitting, tokenization, lemmatization, part-of-speech tagging, chunking and dependency parsing. Concept recognition is provided through dictionary matching and machine learning with normalization methods. Neji also integrates an innovative concept tree implementation, supporting overlapped concept names and respective disambiguation techniques. The most popular input and output formats, namely Pubmed XML, IeXML, CoNLL and A1, are also supported. On top of the built-in functionalities, developers and researchers can implement new processing modules or pipelines, or use the provided command-line interface tool to build their own solutions, applying the most appropriate techniques to identify heterogeneous biomedical concepts. Neji was evaluated against three gold standard corpora with heterogeneous biomedical concepts (CRAFT, AnEM and NCBI disease corpus), achieving high performance results on named entity recognition (F1-measure for overlap matching: species 95%, cell 92%, cellular components 83%, gene and proteins 76%, chemicals 65%, biological processes and molecular functions 63%, disorders 85%, and anatomical entities 82%) and on entity normalization (F1-measure for overlap name matching and correct identifier included in the returned list of identifiers: species 88%, cell 71%, cellular components 72%, gene and proteins 64%, chemicals 53%, and biological processes and molecular functions 40%). Neji provides fast and multi-threaded data processing, annotating up to 1200 sentences/second when using dictionary-based concept identification.
conclusionsConsidering the provided features and underlying characteristics, we believe that Neji is an important contribution to the biomedical community, streamlining the development of complex concept recognition solutions. Neji is freely available at http://bioinformatics.ua.pt/neji.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.