DIFFERENCES IN IONIC CURRENTS BETWEEN CANINE MYOCARDIAL AND PURKINJE CELLS.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Small-conductance calcium-activated potassium channels in the heart: expression, regulation and pathological implications.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
   Review
2. Inherited and Acquired Rhythm Disturbances in Sick Sinus Syndrome, Brugada Syndrome, and Atrial Fibrillation: Lessons from Preclinical Modeling.Cells · 2021
   Review
3. Purkinje physiology and pathophysiology.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2018
   Review
4. Potassium currents in the heart: functional roles in repolarization, arrhythmia and therapeutics.The Journal of physiology · 2017
   Review
5. Cardiac Purkinje fibers and arrhythmias; The GK Moe Award Lecture 2015.Heart rhythm · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as