Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24062729›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2013

Comparative genomics of freshwater Fe-oxidizing bacteria: implications for physiology, ecology, and systematics.

David Emerson, Erin K Field, Olga Chertkov, Karen W Davenport, Lynne Goodwin, Christine Munk, Matt Nolan, Tanja Woyke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Genomic Characterization of a NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deciphering the Mto electron uptake pathway ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Isolation of 'International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Diversity and distribution of iron-oxidising bacteria belonging to Gallionellaceae in different sites of a hydroelectric power plant.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David EmersonBigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, East Boothbay Harbor ME, USA.
Erin K Field
Olga Chertkov
Karen W Davenport
Lynne Goodwin
Christine Munk
Matt Nolan
Tanja Woyke

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The two microaerophilic, Fe-oxidizing bacteria (FeOB) Sideroxydans ES-1 and Gallionella ES-2 have single circular chromosomes of 3.00 and 3.16 Mb that encode 3049 and 3006 genes, respectively. Multi-locus sequence analysis (MLSA) confirmed the relationship of these two organisms to one another, and indicated they may form a novel order, the Gallionellalaes, within the Betaproteobacteria. Both are adapted for chemolithoautotropy, including pathways for CO2-fixation, and electron transport pathways adapted for growth at low O2-levels, an important adaptation for growing on Fe(II). Both genomes contain Mto-genes implicated in iron-oxidation, as well as other genes that could be involved in Fe-oxidation. Nearly 10% of their genomes are devoted to environmental sensing, signal transduction, and chemotaxis, consistent with their requirement for growing in narrow redox gradients of Fe(II) and O2. There are important differences as well. Sideroxydans ES-1 is more metabolically flexible, and can utilize reduced S-compounds, including thiosulfate, for lithotrophic growth. It has a suite of genes for nitrogen fixation. Gallionella ES-2 contains additional gene clusters for exopolysaccharide production, and has more capacity to resist heavy metals. Both strains contain genes for hemerythrins and globins, but ES-1 has an especially high numbers of these genes that may be involved in oxygen homeostasis, or storage. The two strains share homology with the marine FeOB Mariprofundus ferrooxydans PV-1 in CO2 fixation genes, and respiratory genes. In addition, ES-1 shares a suite of 20 potentially redox active genes with PV-1, as well as a large prophage. Combined these genetic, morphological, and physiological differences indicate that these are two novel species, Sideroxydans lithotrophicus ES-1(T) (ATCC 700298(T); JCM 14762; DSMZ 22444; NCMA B100), and Gallionella capsiferriformans ES-2(T) (ATCC 700299(T); JCM 14763; DSMZ 22445; NCMA B101).

Indexed as

Fe-oxidizing bacteriaGallionellaGallionellaceaeiron oxidizing bacteriaSideroxydans

Identifiers

PMID24062729
PMCPMC3770913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.