Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24062579›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2013

Interaction between bud-site selection and polarity-establishment machineries in budding yeast.

Chi-Fang Wu, Natasha S Savage, Daniel J Lew

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Patterning of the cell cortex by Rho GTPases.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Going with the flow: insights fromPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  7. Cell-cycle control of cell polarity in yeast.The Journal of cell biology · 2019
    Article
  8. Cell Polarity in Yeast.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2017
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cell biology of yeast zygotes, from genesis to budding.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Projecting cell polarity into the next decade.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chi-Fang WuDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, , Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Natasha S Savage
Daniel J Lew
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · USUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

POLARITY ESTABLISHMENT IN YEASTR01GM062300 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LEW, DANIEL J · 2001 to 2016
$5.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM62300NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast cells polarize in order to form a single bud in each cell cycle. Distinct patterns of bud-site selection are observed in haploid and diploid cells. Genetic approaches have identified the molecular machinery responsible for positioning the bud site: during bud formation, specific locations are marked with immobile landmark proteins. In the next cell cycle, landmarks act through the Ras-family GTPase Rsr1 to promote local activation of the conserved Rho-family GTPase, Cdc42. Additional Cdc42 accumulates by positive feedback, creating a concentrated patch of GTP-Cdc42, which polarizes the cytoskeleton to promote bud emergence. Using time-lapse imaging and mathematical modelling, we examined the process of bud-site establishment. Imaging reveals unexpected effects of the bud-site-selection system on the dynamics of polarity establishment, raising new questions about how that system may operate. We found that polarity factors sometimes accumulate at more than one site among the landmark-specified locations, and we suggest that competition between clusters of polarity factors determines the final location of the Cdc42 cluster. Modelling indicated that temporally constant landmark-localized Rsr1 would weaken or block competition, yielding more than one polarity site. Instead, we suggest that polarity factors recruit Rsr1, effectively sequestering it from other locations and thereby terminating landmark activity.

Indexed as

Models, Biologicalcdc42 GTP-Binding Protein, Saccharomyces cerevisiaeCell PolarityCell Surface ExtensionsCytoskeletonImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMembrane ProteinsMicroscopy, Confocalrab GTP-Binding ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSaccharomycetalesTime-Lapse Imagingcdc42 GTP-Binding Protein, Saccharomyces cerevisiaeMembrane Proteinsrab GTP-Binding ProteinsRSR1 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsbudCdc42polarityRsr1yeast

Identifiers

PMID24062579
PMCPMC3785959
OpenAlexW2151815494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.