Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24062559›Full record

ReviewRadiology2013

Quantitative imaging in cancer evolution and ecology.

Robert A Gatenby, Olya Grove, Robert J Gillies

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 309 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
309citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

309 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The application of radiomics in laryngeal cancer.The British journal of radiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

249 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert A GatenbyDepartments of Radiology and Cancer Imaging and Metabolism, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL 33612.
Olya Grove
Robert J Gillies

Funding

The Physi(ologi)cal Microenvironment and its Role in Tumor Invasion and MetastaseU54CA143970 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI GATENBY, ROBERT A · 2009 to 2014
$9.3M
Causes & Consequences of Acid pH in TumorsR01CA077575 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI GILLIES, ROBERT J. · 1999 to 2018
$8.5M
Radiomics of NSCLCU01CA143062 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI GILLIES, ROBERT J., SCHABATH, MATTHEW B. · 2010 to 2020
$5.7M
Application of Evolutionary Principles to Maintain Cancer Control (PQ21)R01CA170595 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI GATENBY, ROBERT A · 2012 to 2015
$2.1M
Imaging Biomarkers for Response to Anti-Cancer TherapyR01CA125627 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI BAKER, AMANDA F, GILLIES, ROBERT J. · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA077575NCI NIH HHS R01 CA125627NCI NIH HHS R01 CA170595NCI NIH HHS U01 CA143062NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer therapy, even when highly targeted, typically fails because of the remarkable capacity of malignant cells to evolve effective adaptations. These evolutionary dynamics are both a cause and a consequence of cancer system heterogeneity at many scales, ranging from genetic properties of individual cells to large-scale imaging features. Tumors of the same organ and cell type can have remarkably diverse appearances in different patients. Furthermore, even within a single tumor, marked variations in imaging features, such as necrosis or contrast enhancement, are common. Similar spatial variations recently have been reported in genetic profiles. Radiologic heterogeneity within tumors is usually governed by variations in blood flow, whereas genetic heterogeneity is typically ascribed to random mutations. However, evolution within tumors, as in all living systems, is subject to Darwinian principles; thus, it is governed by predictable and reproducible interactions between environmental selection forces and cell phenotype (not genotype). This link between regional variations in environmental properties and cellular adaptive strategies may permit clinical imaging to be used to assess and monitor intratumoral evolution in individual patients. This approach is enabled by new methods that extract, report, and analyze quantitative, reproducible, and mineable clinical imaging data. However, most current quantitative metrics lack spatialness, expressing quantitative radiologic features as a single value for a region of interest encompassing the whole tumor. In contrast, spatially explicit image analysis recognizes that tumors are heterogeneous but not well mixed and defines regionally distinct habitats, some of which appear to harbor tumor populations that are more aggressive and less treatable than others. By identifying regional variations in key environmental selection forces and evidence of cellular adaptation, clinical imaging can enable us to define intratumoral Darwinian dynamics before and during therapy. Advances in image analysis will place clinical imaging in an increasingly central role in the development of evolution-based patient-specific cancer therapy.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticDiagnostic ImagingEcologyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansNeoplasmsPrecision Medicine

Identifiers

PMID24062559
PMCPMC3781355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.