Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24062495›Full record

ArticleThe journal of family planning and reproductive health care2013

Embracing post-fertilisation methods of family planning: a call to action.

Elizabeth G Raymond, Francine Coeytaux, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, Kirsten Moore, James Trussell, Beverly Winikoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of family planning and reproductive health care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth G RaymondSenior Medial Associate, Gynuity Health Projects, New York, NY, USA.
Francine Coeytaux
Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson
Kirsten Moore
James Trussell
Beverly Winikoff

Funding

Infrastructure for Population Research at PrincetonR24HD047879 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MASSEY, DOUGLAS S · 2004 to 2013
$7.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD047879NICHD NIH HHS R24HD047 879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Family planning methods that act when administered after fertilisation would have substantial benefits: they could be used longer after sex than current emergency contraceptives, and potentially a woman could use them only on relatively rare occasions when her menstrual period is delayed. Although such methods would displease abortion opponents, they would likely be welcomed by many women. Research to develop post-fertilisation fertility control agents should be pursued.

Indexed as

Contraception, PostcoitalAbortion, InducedFemaleFertilizationHumansPoliticsAbortionEmergency ContraceptionHormonal Contraception

Identifiers

PMID24062495
PMCPMC3855690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.