Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24062484›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2013

Malaria diagnostics in clinical trials.

Sean C Murphy, Joseph P Shott, Sunil Parikh, Paige Etter, William R Prescott, V Ann Stewart

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Open forum infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sean C MurphyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases,National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut; Office of HIV/AIDS Network Coordination, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Hydas World Health, Hershey, Pennsylvania; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
Joseph P Shott
Sunil Parikh
Paige Etter
William R Prescott
V Ann Stewart

Funding

Leadership Group for a Global HIV Vaccine Clinical Trials NetworkU01AI068614 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI COREY, LAWRENCE · 2006 to 2010
$181.5M
Optimizing HIV-malaria treatment in a shifting treatment and resistance landscape in AfricaR01HD068174 · NICHD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FRANCESCA T. AWEEKA, SUNIL PARIKH · 2011 to 2026
$8.1M
NIH MALARIA RESEARCH AND REFERENCE REAGENT REPOSITORYN01AI085355 · NIAID · BIORESOURCES LABORATORIES, INC. · PI WU, YIMAN · 1998 to 2000
$1.4M
Identification of responding CD8+ T cells and novel protective epitopes followingK08AI097238 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MURPHY, SEAN C · 2011 to 2015
$633k
Intramural NIH HHSNIAID NIH HHS 1K08AI097238NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI097238NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-85355NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068614NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD068174NICHD NIH HHS R01HD068174NIDA NIH HHS N01 AI085355PHS HHS U01A1068614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria diagnostics are widely used in epidemiologic studies to investigate natural history of disease and in drug and vaccine clinical trials to exclude participants or evaluate efficacy. The Malaria Laboratory Network (MLN), managed by the Office of HIV/AIDS Network Coordination, is an international working group with mutual interests in malaria disease and diagnosis and in human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome clinical trials. The MLN considered and studied the wide array of available malaria diagnostic tests for their suitability for screening trial participants and/or obtaining study endpoints for malaria clinical trials, including studies of HIV/malaria co-infection and other malaria natural history studies. The MLN provides recommendations on microscopy, rapid diagnostic tests, serologic tests, and molecular assays to guide selection of the most appropriate test(s) for specific research objectives. In addition, this report provides recommendations regarding quality management to ensure reproducibility across sites in clinical trials. Performance evaluation, quality control, and external quality assessment are critical processes that must be implemented in all clinical trials using malaria tests.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCoinfectionCooperative BehaviorHIV InfectionsHumansImmunoassayMalariaMicroscopyQuality ControlReagent Kits, DiagnosticReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID24062484
PMCPMC3820323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.