ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2013
Commentary: On representativeness.
Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Mendelian randomization analysis of 37 clinical factors and coronary artery disease in East Asian and European populations.Genome medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison of risk factor associations in UK Biobank against representative, general population based studies with conventional response rates: prospective cohort study and individual participant meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- Adverse childhood experiences and adulthood physical performance: the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil).Cadernos de saude publica · 2026Article
- Redefining Representativeness of a Sample in Causal Terms.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- Association of chronic stress during studies with depressive symptoms 10 years later.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Reweighting UK Biobank corrects for pervasive selection bias due to volunteering.International journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Factors Influencing the Behavioral Intentions and Use Behaviors of Telemedicine in Patients With Diabetes: Web-Based Survey Study.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- Defining representativeness of study samples in medical and population health research.BMJ medicine · 2023Article
- Review
- Generalizability and representativeness: Considerations for internet-based research on substance use behaviors.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2022Article
- Impervious to Randomness: Confounding and Selection Biases in Randomized Clinical Trials.Cancer investigation · 2021Article
- Generalizability of findings from a clinical sample to a community-based sample: A comparison of ADNI and ARIC.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2021Article
- Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Saint Petersburg, Russia: a population-based study.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Genetic analyses identify widespread sex-differential participation bias.Nature genetics · 2021Article
- Article
- Cystatin C and creatinine-based eGFR levels and their correlation to long-term morbidity and mortality in older adults.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2019Article
- Evaluating selection bias in a population-based cohort study with low baseline participation: the LIFE-Adult-Study.BMC medical research methodology · 2019Article
- Target Validity and the Hierarchy of Study Designs.American journal of epidemiology · 2019Article
- The second generation of The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC-G2): a cohort profile.Wellcome open research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24062288What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.