Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24061719›Full record

Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2014

Intra- and post-operative accuracy assessments of two different patient-specific instrumentation systems for total knee replacement.

Andrea Ensini, Antonio Timoncini, Francesco Cenni, Claudio Belvedere, Francesca Fusai, Alberto Leardini, Sandro Giannini

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Favourable alignment outcomes with MRI-based patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Surgical accuracy in high tibial osteotomy: coronal equivalence of computer navigation and gap measurement.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Clinical application of distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide based on knee CT and full-length X-ray film of lower extremities].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Does final component alignment correlate with alignment of the bone resection surfaces in cemented total knee arthroplasty?Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrea EnsiniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy.
Antonio Timoncini
Francesco Cenni
Claudio Belvedere
Francesca Fusai
Alberto Leardini
Sandro Giannini

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to assess and compare the accuracy of two different patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) systems for total knee replacement, both intra-operatively for bone preparation and post-operatively for final component alignment.

methodsTwenty-five patients were treated according to a computer tomography (CT)-based PSI system (group A) and 25 to a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/X-ray-based system (group B). Alignments on the three anatomical planes and resection thickness at the cutting blocks and at the resulting bone cuts were recorded intra-operatively by a standard surgical navigation system. Alignments of the prosthetic components and mechanical axis were also measured post-operatively on radiographs. These measurements at both the femur and tibia were compared with those of the corresponding pre-operative planning, considering discrepancies larger than 3° as outliers.

resultsIn both groups, the mean absolute differences between pre-operatively planned alignments and corresponding intra- and post-operative measurements ranged from a minimum of 1.2° to a maximum of 2.9° in all three anatomical planes. In both groups and in both femur and tibia, the plane with the smallest percentage of outliers was the coronal, maximum 17%. The comparison between two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.02) in the femoral sagittal plane, where group B showed smaller alignment discrepancies at the cutting blocks.

conclusionsBoth PSI systems showed good alignments in the coronal plane in all stages. For a few measurements, a better performance was observed in the MRI/X-ray-based system than in the CT-based system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemurHumansIntraoperative PeriodKnee JointKnee ProsthesisOsteoarthritis, KneePostoperative PeriodSurgery, Computer-AssistedTibiaTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.