Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24061717›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2014

Influence of response shift on early patient-reported outcomes following autologous chondrocyte implantation.

Jennifer S Howard, Carl G Mattacola, David R Mullineaux, Robert A English, Christian Lattermann

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Impact of response shift on change in patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer S HowardDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington KY, Wethington Building, Room 206B, 900 South Limestone, Lexington, KY, 40536-0200, USA, J.S.Howard@uky.edu.
Carl G Mattacola
David R Mullineaux
Robert A English
Christian Lattermann

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000117 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2012 to 2015
$13.3M
Clinical and Biochemical Predictors of Outcome after Knee Injury in Young PatientK23AR060275 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI LATTERMANN, CHRISTIAN · 2012 to 2016
$566k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000117NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000117NIAMS NIH HHS 1K23AR060275-01A1NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR060275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeResponse shift is the phenomenon by which an individual's standards for evaluation change over time. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients undergoing autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) experience response shift.

methodsForty-eight patients undergoing ACI participated. The "then-test" method was used to evaluate response shift in commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)-the SF-36 Physical Component Scale (SF-36 PCS), WOMAC, IKDC, and Lysholm. Each PROM was completed pre- and 6 and 12 months post-surgery. At 6 and 12 months, an additional "then" version of each form was also completed. The "then" version was identical to the original except that patients were instructed to assess how they were prior to ACI. Traditional change, response shift adjusted change, and response shift magnitude were calculated at 6 and 12 months. T tests (p < 0.05) were used to compare traditional change to response-shift-adjusted change, and response shift magnitude values to previously established minimal detectable change.

resultsThere were no differences between traditional change and response-shift-adjusted change for any of the PROMs. The mean response shift magnitude value of the WOMAC at 6 months (15 ± 14, p = 0.047) was greater than the previously established minimal detectable change (10.9). The mean response shift magnitude value for the SF-36 PCS at 12 months (9.4 ± 6.8, p = 0.017) also exceeded the previously established minimal detectable change (6.6).

conclusionsThere was no evidence of a group-level effect for response shift. These results support the validity of pre-test/post-test research designs in evaluating treatment effects. However, there is evidence that response shifts may occur on a patient-by-patient basis, and scores on the WOMAC and SF-36 in particular may be influenced by response shift. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Indexed as

Patient Outcome AssessmentAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultChondrocytesFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleOrthopedic ProceduresQuality of LifeTransplantation, AutologousTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24061717
PMCPMC3947741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.