SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014
Quantitative assessment of the association between XPG Asp1104His polymorphism and bladder cancer risk.
Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association study between XPG Asp1104His polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk in a Chinese population.Scientific reports · 2014Article
- Single nucleotide polymorphisms of nucleotide excision repair and homologous recombination repair pathways and their role in the risk of osteosarcoma.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Published data regarding the association between XPG Asp1104His polymorphism and bladder cancer risk remained controversial. This meta-analysis of literatures was performed to draw a more precise estimation of the relationship. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science with a time limit of June 22, 2013. Summary odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % CIs were used to assess the strength of the association between XPG Asp1104His polymorphism and bladder cancer risk using random effects model. A total of eight case-control studies including 2,613 cases and 2,934 controls were included for analysis. Overall, no significant association was found between XPG Asp1104His polymorphism and bladder cancer susceptibility for CC vs. GG (OR = 1.12, 95 % CI = 0.74-1.69), GC vs. GG (OR = 1.12, 95 % CI = 0.86-1.46), the dominant model CC + GC vs. GG (OR = 1.08, 95 % CI = 0.85-1.38), and the recessive model CC vs. GC + GG (OR = 0.92, 95 % CI = 0.66-1.29). In the subgroup analysis, no significant associations were found in either Asian or non-Asian population. This meta-analysis suggested that XPG Asp1104His polymorphism was not associated with bladder cancer risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.