Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2014
Transanal single-port microsurgery for rectal tumors: minimal invasive surgery under spinal anesthesia.
Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early rectal cancer: the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) clinical consensus conference.Surgical endoscopy · 2015Guideline
- A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013.Techniques in coloproctology · 2014Pooled it
- Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Lesions.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsTrial
- Efficacy, Safety and Oncological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Approaches (EMR, ESD and TAMIS) for Early Rectal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Review
- The Role of Transanal Endoscopic Surgery for Early Rectal Cancer.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2022Review
- Endoscopic full-thickness dissection (EFTD) in the rectum: a case series.Techniques in coloproctology · 2022Article
- Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal neuroendocrine tumors.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Transanal minimally invasive surgery using laparoscopic instruments of the rectum: A review.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021Review
- Education and Training in Transanal Endoscopic Surgery and Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2021Review
- Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2021Review
- Article
- Trans-anal minimally invasive surgery for rectal neoplasia: Experience from single tertiary institution in China.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2018Article
- Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal polyps and selected malignant tumors: caution concerning intermediate-term functional results.International journal of colorectal disease · 2017Article
- Transanal minimally invasive surgery for benign large rectal polyps and early malignant rectal cancers: experience and outcomes from the first Canadian centre to adopt the technique.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2017Article
- Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS): a clinical spotlight review.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Article
- Conventional transanal excision for a very low gastrointestinal stromal tumour.BMJ case reports · 2017Article
- Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer: T1 and beyond? An evidence-based review.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Review
- Transanal endoscopic resection with peritoneal entry: a word of caution.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Article
- [Full thickness resection device (FTRD). Experience and outcome for benign neoplasms of the rectum and colon].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for rectal tumors has been introduced as an alternative approach to transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). TEM has some limitations, such as the need for special equipment, expensive cost, and steep learning curve. In this study, we address the technical feasibility of TAMIS under spinal anesthesia and its short-term postoperative outcomes.
methodsFrom July 2011 to September 2012, 25 consecutive patients with middle or upper third rectal masses underwent TAMIS. Tumors were located 6-17 cm from the anal verge. After spinal anesthesia, a single-incision laparoscopic surgery port was inserted into the anal canal. With this access, conventional laparoscopic instruments, including a grasper and monopolar electrocautery and suction device, were used to perform the transanal excision. A hook-type monopolar electrocautery or harmonic scalpel was used for dissection. The defect of the rectum was closed by interrupted sutures. Data concerning demographics, details of operative procedure, postoperative pain, and pathologic results were collected prospectively. To evaluate anal sphincter injury, an endoanal ultrasonography and fecal incontinence severity index survey were performed at 3-6 months after the operation.
resultsOf the 25 patients, nine had adenocarcinomas, nine had neuroendocrine tumors, three had tubular adenomas with high-grade dysplasia, three had tubular adenomas, one had a tubulovillous adenoma, and one had a gastrointestinal stromal tumor. The median distance from the tumor mass to the anal verge was 9.0 (range 6-17) cm. The median operative time was 45.0 (range 20-120) min. All patients received TAMIS without conversion to laparoscopic resection. There were no intraoperative complications or postoperative morbidity. The median postoperative hospital stay was 3.0 (range 2-7) days. No sphincter injury was detected by endoanal ultrasonography.
conclusionsTAMIS under spinal anesthesia is a safe and feasible technique for resection of middle and upper rectal masses. Spinal anesthesia is adequate for this procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.