Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24061623›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2014

Transanal single-port microsurgery for rectal tumors: minimal invasive surgery under spinal anesthesia.

Taek-Gu Lee, Sang-Jeon Lee

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Lesions.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taek-Gu LeeDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, 52 Naesudong-ro, Heungdeok-gu, Cheongju, 361-763, Chungbuk, South Korea, ninehouse@hanmail.net.
Sang-Jeon Lee
Chungbuk National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for rectal tumors has been introduced as an alternative approach to transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). TEM has some limitations, such as the need for special equipment, expensive cost, and steep learning curve. In this study, we address the technical feasibility of TAMIS under spinal anesthesia and its short-term postoperative outcomes.

methodsFrom July 2011 to September 2012, 25 consecutive patients with middle or upper third rectal masses underwent TAMIS. Tumors were located 6-17 cm from the anal verge. After spinal anesthesia, a single-incision laparoscopic surgery port was inserted into the anal canal. With this access, conventional laparoscopic instruments, including a grasper and monopolar electrocautery and suction device, were used to perform the transanal excision. A hook-type monopolar electrocautery or harmonic scalpel was used for dissection. The defect of the rectum was closed by interrupted sutures. Data concerning demographics, details of operative procedure, postoperative pain, and pathologic results were collected prospectively. To evaluate anal sphincter injury, an endoanal ultrasonography and fecal incontinence severity index survey were performed at 3-6 months after the operation.

resultsOf the 25 patients, nine had adenocarcinomas, nine had neuroendocrine tumors, three had tubular adenomas with high-grade dysplasia, three had tubular adenomas, one had a tubulovillous adenoma, and one had a gastrointestinal stromal tumor. The median distance from the tumor mass to the anal verge was 9.0 (range 6-17) cm. The median operative time was 45.0 (range 20-120) min. All patients received TAMIS without conversion to laparoscopic resection. There were no intraoperative complications or postoperative morbidity. The median postoperative hospital stay was 3.0 (range 2-7) days. No sphincter injury was detected by endoanal ultrasonography.

conclusionsTAMIS under spinal anesthesia is a safe and feasible technique for resection of middle and upper rectal masses. Spinal anesthesia is adequate for this procedure.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdenomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnesthesia, SpinalColonoscopyFecal IncontinenceFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMicrosurgeryMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID24061623
OpenAlexW2039281461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.