ArticleInteractive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2014
Concept and first experimental results of a new ferromagnetic assist device for extra-aortic counterpulsation.
Article in Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a Self-Deploying Extra-Aortic Compression Device for Medium-Term Hemodynamic Stabilization: A Feasibility Study.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- A novel soft cardiac assist device based on a dielectric elastomer augmented aorta: An in vivo study.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesBased on a ferromagnetic silicone cuff for extra-aortic counterpulsation, a new assist device concept was developed. The driving force is generated by an external magnetic field, which leads to contraction of a soft magnetic cuff. The force generation capacity of the device was tested in a silicone aorta model.
methodsMagnetic elastomers can be constructed through dispersion of micro- or nanoparticles in polymer matrices and were designed to act as soft actuators. Two magnetically active silicone cuffs were produced with a nanomagnet loading of 250 wt% (Cuff 1) and a micromagnet loading of 67 wt% (Cuff 2). The magnetic cuffs were applied on a silicone aorta model and contracted against hydrostatic pressure.
resultsA full contraction of Cuff 1 was possible against a maximal hydrostatic pressure of 30 cmH₂O (22 mmHg) at a magnetic flux density of 0.4 T (Tesla) and 65 cmH₂O (48 mmHg) at a magnetic flux density of 1.2 T. A 50% contraction of Cuff 2 was possible against a maximal hydrostatic pressure of 80 cmH₂O (59 mmHg) at a magnet-cuff-distance (MCD) of 0 cm. At MCDs of 1 and 2 cm a 50% contraction was possible against 33 cmH₂O (24 mmHg) and 10 cmH₂O (7 mmHg), respectively.
conclusionsCombining the advantages of magnetic elastomers with the principle of extra-aortic counterpulsation in a new assist device concept avoids the need for anticoagulation (no contact with bloodstream). With regard to the magnetic principle of action, no intra- to extracorporeal connection is needed. More experimental work is needed to further increase the force generated by the silicone cuff and to transfer the device concept into an in vivo setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.