Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24060707›Full record

Trial reportPain2014

A pilot trial of intravenous pamidronate for chronic low back pain.

Marco Pappagallo, Brenda Breuer, Hung-Mo Lin, James B Moberly, Julia Tai, Christopher Noto, Angela Sanchez, Paolo L Manfredi

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marco PappagalloDepartment of Pain Medicine and Palliative Care, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY, USA Department of Health Evidence and Policy, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA Department of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA Grünenthal USA, Bedminster, NJ, USA The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research at North Shore-LIJ Health System, Long Island, NY, USA Patrician Medical, West Chester, PA, USA.
Brenda Breuer
Hung-Mo Lin
James B Moberly
Julia Tai
Christopher Noto
Angela Sanchez
Paolo L Manfredi
Feinstein Institute for Medical Research · USMount Sinai Hospital · USMount Sinai Beth Israel · USMount Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

ZIPRASIDONE (GEODON) AUGMENTATION IN SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITOR-RESISTANT OBM01RR000071 · NCRR · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI NEWCORN, JEFFREY H · 1985 to 2009
$41.5M
MOUNT SINAI INSTITUTES FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1RR029887 · NCRR · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SAMPSON, HUGH A · 2009 to 2011
$19.2M
A Pilot Trial of IV Pamidronate for Low Back PainR01NS044845 · NINDS · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI PAPPAGALLO, MARCO · 2003 to 2005
$1.7M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000071NCRR NIH HHS M01RR000071NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029887NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR029887NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044845NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS44845-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravenous (i.v.) bisphosphonates relieve pain in conditions such as Paget's disease of bone, metastatic bone disease, and multiple myeloma. Based on positive findings from a prior case series, we conducted a randomized placebo-controlled study to assess the analgesic effect of i.v. pamidronate in subjects with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and evidence of degenerative disease of the spine. Four groups of 11 subjects (7 active, 4 placebo) were enrolled at escalating dose levels of 30, 60, 90, and 180 mg pamidronate (the latter administered as two 90 mg infusions). Primary outcomes were safety and change from baseline in average daily pain scores, recorded at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months postinfusion using electronic diaries. Secondary outcomes included responder rate, daily worst pain, and pain-related interference with daily function. There were no pamidronate-related serious adverse events or other significant safety findings. A statistically significant overall treatment difference in pain scores was observed, with clinically meaningful effects persisting for 6 months in the 180 mg pamidronate group. Least squares mean changes in daily average pain score were -1.39 (SE=0.43) for placebo, and -1.53 (0.71), -1.26 (0.81), -1.42 (0.65), and -4.13 (0.65) for pamidronate 30, 60, 90, and 180 mg, respectively (P=0.012 for pamidronate 180 mg vs placebo). The proportion of responders, changes in worst pain, and pain interference with daily function were also significantly improved for pamidronate 180 mg compared with placebo. In conclusion, i.v. pamidronate, administered as two 90 mg infusions, decreased pain intensity for 6 months in subjects with CLBP.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdultAgedBone Density Conservation AgentsChronic PainDiphosphonatesDisability EvaluationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPamidronateBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesPamidronateAnalgesiaBisphosphonateCLBPMusculoskeletal painNonspecific low back pain

Identifiers

PMID24060707
PMCPMC3947358
OpenAlexW2008699189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.