Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24060297›Full record

Trial reportContraception2013

Contraceptive adherence among HIV-infected women in Malawi: a randomized controlled trial of the copper intrauterine device and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate.

Lisa B Haddad, Carrie Cwiak, Denise J Jamieson, Caryl Feldacker, Hannock Tweya, Mina Hosseinipour, Irving Hoffman, Amy G Bryant, Gretchen S Stuart, Isaac Noah and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contraception, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2024.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2024
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Medical eligibility, contraceptive choice, and intrauterine device acceptance among HIV-infected women receiving antiretroviral therapy in Lilongwe, Malawi.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisa B HaddadEmory University, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: lbhadda@emory.edu.
Carrie Cwiak
Denise J Jamieson
Caryl Feldacker
Hannock Tweya
Mina Hosseinipour
Irving Hoffman
Amy G Bryant
Gretchen S Stuart
Isaac Noah
Linly Mulundila
Bernadette Samala
Patrick Mayne
Sam Phiri
Lighthouse Trust · MWEmory University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USBrown University · USMinistry of Health · MWOffice of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology · US

Funding

Virology and Molecular Biomarkers CoreP30AI050409 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carlos del Rio · 2002 to 2026
$74.0M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate contraceptive adherence to the copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) and the injectable depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) among women with HIV in Lilongwe, Malawi.

methodsWe randomized 200 HIV-infected women on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) to either the Cu-IUD or DMPA and followed these women prospectively, evaluating adherence and factors associated with nonadherence.

resultsThere was no difference in contraceptive adherence: 68% of Cu-IUD and 65% of DMPA users were adherent at 48 weeks. Receiving first-choice contraceptive was not associated with adherence. Women commonly cited partner's disapproval as an indication for discontinuation. Women who experienced heavy menstruation and first-time contraceptive users were more likely to be nonadherent. Among ongoing users at study conclusion, 95% were happy with their method, and 98% would recommend their method to a friend.

conclusionContraceptive adherence between the Cu-IUD and DMPA was similar at 1 year. With similar adherence and similar high rates of satisfaction among users of both methods at 1 year, the Cu-IUD offers a hormone-free alternative to DMPA. IMPLICATIONS: Adherence to the Cu-IUD and DMPA is similar at 1 year among HIV-infected women on HAART in a randomized controlled trial. Despite high method satisfaction, partner disapproval and heavy bleeding contribute to reduced adherence. Receiving a method that differs from participant's first-choice method did not influence adherence.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorIntrauterine Devices, CopperPatient ComplianceAdultContraceptive Agents, FemaleFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMalawiMedroxyprogesterone AcetateContraceptive Agents, FemaleMedroxyprogesterone AcetateAdherenceContraceptionDepot medroxyprogesterone acetateDMPAHIVIUD

Identifiers

PMID24060297
PMCPMC4108248
OpenAlexW2098320715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.