Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24059937›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2013

Safe, stable, nurturing relationships as a moderator of intergenerational continuity of child maltreatment: a meta-analysis.

Thomas J Schofield, Rosalyn D Lee, Melissa T Merrick

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas J SchofieldHuman Development and Family Studies, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. Electronic address: tommy@iastate.edu.
Rosalyn D Lee
Melissa T Merrick

Funding

CRITICAL TRANSITIONS IN RURAL FAMILIES AT RISKR01MH051361 · NIMH · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CONGER, RAND DONALD · 1994 to 2009
$6.3M
Economic Stress &Child Development Across 3 GenerationsR01HD047573 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CONGER, RAND DONALD, NEPPL, TRICIA K. · 2004 to 2010
$4.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD047573NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH051361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe present paper summarizes findings of the special issue papers on the intergenerational continuity of child maltreatment and through meta-analysis explores the potential moderating effects of safe, stable, nurturing relationships (SSNRs).

methodsStudies were selected for inclusion in this meta-analysis if they (1) were published in peer-reviewed journals; (2) tested for intergenerational continuity in any form of child maltreatment, using prospective, longitudinal data; and (3) tested for moderating effects of any variable of SSNRs on intergenerational continuity of child maltreatment. The search revealed only one additional study beyond the four reports written for this special issue that met inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis.

resultsEstimates of intergenerational stability of child maltreatment from the studies included in this special issue are consistent with several other studies, which find that child maltreatment in one generation is positively related to child maltreatment in the next generation. Furthermore, meta-analytic results from the five studies that met the inclusion criteria suggest a protective, moderating effect of SSNRs on intergenerational continuity of child maltreatment. The calculated fail-safe index indicated that 49 unpublished intergenerational studies with an average null effect would be required to render nonsignificant the overall moderation effect of SSNRs on child maltreatment.

conclusionsThis special issue expanded the examination of SSNRs beyond the caregiver-child dyad. That is, these studies considered SSNRs in adult relationships as well as parent-child relationships. Results suggest that certain types of SSNRs between parents and other adults (e.g., romantic partner, co-parent, or adult social support resource) may decrease maltreatment continuity.

Indexed as

Intergenerational RelationsParent-Child RelationsSocial SupportAdultAdult Survivors of Child AbuseChildChild AbuseHumansSexual PartnersBuffering protective effectsChild maltreatmentIntergenerational continuitySafe, stable nurturing relationships (SSNRs)Transgenerational patterns

Identifiers

PMID24059937
PMCPMC3784834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.