Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24059907›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2013

A powerful latent variable method for detecting and characterizing gene-based gene-gene interaction on multiple quantitative traits.

Fangyu Li, Jinghua Zhao, Zhongshang Yuan, Xiaoshuai Zhang, Jiadong Ji, Fuzhong Xue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Detecting epistasis in human complex traits.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fangyu LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China. xuefzh@sdu.edu.cn.
Jinghua Zhao
Zhongshang Yuan
Xiaoshuai Zhang
Jiadong Ji
Fuzhong Xue

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOn thinking quantitatively of complex diseases, there are at least three statistical strategies for analyzing the gene-gene interaction: SNP by SNP interaction on single trait, gene-gene (each can involve multiple SNPs) interaction on single trait and gene-gene interaction on multiple traits. The third one is the most general in dissecting the genetic mechanism underlying complex diseases underpinning multiple quantitative traits. In this paper, we developed a novel statistic for this strategy through modifying the Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLSPM), called mPLSPM statistic.

resultsSimulation studies indicated that mPLSPM statistic was powerful and outperformed the principal component analysis (PCA) based linear regression method. Application to real data in the EPIC-Norfolk GWAS sub-cohort showed suggestive interaction (γ) between TMEM18 gene and BDNF gene on two composite body shape scores (γ = 0.047 and γ = 0.058, with P = 0.021, P = 0.005), and BMI (γ = 0.043, P = 0.034). This suggested these scores (synthetically latent traits) were more suitable to capture the obesity related genetic interaction effect between genes compared to single trait.

conclusionsThe proposed novel mPLSPM statistic is a valid and powerful gene-based method for detecting gene-gene interaction on multiple quantitative phenotypes.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticBody Mass IndexBody SizeBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansLinear ModelsMembrane ProteinsObesityPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrincipal Component AnalysisQuantitative Trait LociSoftwareBDNF protein, humanBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorMembrane ProteinsTMEM18 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID24059907
PMCPMC3848962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.