Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24059812›Full record

ArticleSchool psychology quarterly : the official journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association2013

Initial validation of the prekindergarten Classroom Observation Tool and goal setting system for data-based coaching.

April D Crawford, Tricia A Zucker, Jeffrey M Williams, Vibhuti Bhavsar, Susan H Landry

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in School psychology quarterly : the official journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

April D CrawfordDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Learning Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Tricia A ZuckerDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Learning Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Jeffrey M WilliamsDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Learning Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Vibhuti BhavsarDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Learning Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Susan H LandryDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Learning Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although coaching is a popular approach for enhancing the quality of Tier 1 instruction, limited research has addressed observational measures specifically designed to focus coaching on evidence-based practices. This study explains the development of the prekindergarten (pre-k) Classroom Observation Tool (COT) designed for use in a data-based coaching model. We examined psychometric characteristics of the COT and explored how coaches and teachers used the COT goal-setting system. The study included 193 coaches working with 3,909 pre-k teachers in a statewide professional development program. Classrooms served 3 and 4 year olds (n = 56,390) enrolled mostly in Title I, Head Start, and other need-based pre-k programs. Coaches used the COT during a 2-hr observation at the beginning of the academic year. Teachers collected progress-monitoring data on children's language, literacy, and math outcomes three times during the year. Results indicated a theoretically supported eight-factor structure of the COT across language, literacy, and math instructional domains. Overall interrater reliability among coaches was good (.75). Although correlations with an established teacher observation measure were small, significant positive relations between COT scores and children's literacy outcomes indicate promising predictive validity. Patterns of goal-setting behaviors indicate teachers and coaches set an average of 43.17 goals during the academic year, and coaches reported that 80.62% of goals were met. Both coaches and teachers reported the COT was a helpful measure for enhancing quality of Tier 1 instruction. Limitations of the current study and implications for research and data-based coaching efforts are discussed.

Indexed as

AdultChild, PreschoolFacultyHumansObservationProfessional CompetencePsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID24059812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.