Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24059462›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in medicinal chemistry2013

Drug repurposing: translational pharmacology, chemistry, computers and the clinic.

Naiem T Issa, Stephen W Byers, Sivanesan Dakshanamurthy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in medicinal chemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Synergistic drug combinations from electronic health records and gene expression.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Naiem T IssaDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Cancer Center, USA. sd233@georgetown.edu.
Stephen W Byers
Sivanesan Dakshanamurthy

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Louis M Weiner · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science (GHUUL1TR000101 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MELLMAN, THOMAS A, VERBALIS, JOSEPH G · 2012 to 2015
$19.3M
Targeting CDK4 in TGS-B Inactivated Gastrointestinal CancersP01CA130821 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MISHRA, LOPA · 2008 to 2013
$6.9M
Cadherin11 in cancer & rheumatoid arthritis: Common target, common therapies? (5)R01CA170653 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI BYERS, STEPHEN W · 2012 to 2015
$2.4M
Beta-catenin-specific regulation of the vitamin D pathway in colon cancerR01CA129813 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI BYERS, STEPHEN W · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000101NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000101NCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENCI NIH HHS P01 CA130821NCI NIH HHS P01CA130821NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS P30CA51008NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129813NCI NIH HHS R01-CA129813NCI NIH HHS R01 CA170653NCI NIH HHS R01-CA170653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of discovering a pharmacological compound that elicits a desired clinical effect with minimal side effects is a challenge. Prior to the advent of high-performance computing and large-scale screening technologies, drug discovery was largely a serendipitous endeavor, as in the case of thalidomide for erythema nodosum leprosum or cancer drugs in general derived from flora located in far-reaching geographic locations. More recently, de novo drug discovery has become a more rationalized process where drug-target-effect hypotheses are formulated on the basis of already known compounds/protein targets and their structures. Although this approach is hypothesis-driven, the actual success has been very low, contributing to the soaring costs of research and development as well as the diminished pharmaceutical pipeline in the United States. In this review, we discuss the evolution in computational pharmacology as the next generation of successful drug discovery and implementation in the clinic where high-performance computing (HPC) is used to generate and validate drug-target-effect hypotheses completely in silico. The use of HPC would decrease development time and errors while increasing productivity prior to in vitro, animal and human testing. We highlight approaches in chemoinformatics, bioinformatics as well as network biopharmacology to illustrate potential avenues from which to design clinically efficacious drugs. We further discuss the implications of combining these approaches into an integrative methodology for high-accuracy computational predictions within the context of drug repositioning for the efficient streamlining of currently approved drugs back into clinical trials for possible new indications.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDrug RepositioningDrug TherapyPharmacologyTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID24059462
PMCPMC11968090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.