Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24058901›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2013

DNA damage tolerance: a double-edged sword guarding the genome.

Gargi Ghosal, Junjie Chen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 195 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Targeting mDiscover oncology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Dynamic Assemblies in Genome Maintenance.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  6. The 9-1-1 complex protects ssDNA gaps in BRCA2-deficient cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Male aging in germ cells: What are we inheriting?Genetics and molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gargi GhosalDepartment of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Junjie Chen
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Analysis of BRCA1 Function in DNA RepairR01CA089239 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CHEN, JUNJIE · 2001 to 2015
$3.7M
Study the Role of DNA Damage Responses in Tumorigenesis and SenescenceR01CA092312 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CHEN, JUNJIE · 2001 to 2015
$3.5M
Analysis of 53BP1 function in DNA Damage-signaled pathway and TumorigenesisR01CA100109 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CHEN, JUNJIE · 2003 to 2010
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA089239NCI NIH HHS R01 CA092312NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preservation of genome integrity is an essential process for cell homeostasis. During the course of life of a single cell, the genome is constantly damaged by endogenous and exogenous agents. To ensure genome stability, cells use a global signaling network, namely the DNA damage response (DDR) to sense and repair DNA damage. DDR senses different types of DNA damage and coordinates a response that includes activation of transcription, cell cycle control, DNA repair pathways, apoptosis, senescence, and cell death. Despite several repair mechanisms that repair different types of DNA lesions, it is likely that the replication machinery would still encounter lesions that are mis-repaired or not repaired. Replication of damaged genome would result in high frequency of fork collapse and genome instability. In this scenario, the cells employ the DNA damage tolerance (DDT) pathway that recruits a specialized low fidelity translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerase to bypass the lesions for repair at a later time point. Thus, DDT is not a repair pathway per se, but provides a mechanism to tolerate DNA lesions during replication thereby increasing survival and preventing genome instability. Paradoxically, DDT process is also associated with increased mutagenesis, which can in turn drive the cell to cancer development. Thus, DDT process functions as a double-edged sword guarding the genome. In this review, we will discuss the replication stress induced DNA damage-signaling cascade, the stabilization and rescue of stalled replication forks by the DDT pathway and the effect of the DDT pathway on cancer.

Indexed as

DNA damage tolerance (DDT)proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)replicative DNA polymerasestalled replication forkstranslesion polymerasetranslesion synthesis (TLS)

Identifiers

PMID24058901
PMCPMC3779140
OpenAlexW2156607330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.