ArticleWorm2012
WormBase: Annotating many nematode genomes.
Article in Worm, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell-based screen identifies translation state modulators that extend lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026Article
- Ribonucleases in Mendelian disease: Characterization and insight from model organisms.Genes & diseases · 2025Review
- Article
- Expanding automated gene summaries formicroPublication biology · 2024Article
- Attenuation of Dopaminergic Neurodegeneration in aJournal of developmental biology · 2023Article
- Nematode gene annotation by machine-learning-assisted proteotranscriptomics enables proteome-wide evolutionary analysis.Genome research · 2023Article
- Mixing genome annotation methods in a comparative analysis inflates the apparent number of lineage-specific genes.Current biology : CB · 2022Article
- Hybrid de novo whole-genome assembly and annotation of the model tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta.Scientific data · 2019Article
- WormBase 2017: molting into a new stage.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- WormBase ParaSite - a comprehensive resource for helminth genomics.Molecular and biochemical parasitology · 2017Article
- MiRNATIP: a SOM-based miRNA-target interactions predictor.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- The EMBL-EBI bioinformatics web and programmatic tools framework.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- WormBase 2014: new views of curated biology.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
WormBase (www.wormbase.org) has been serving the scientific community for over 11 years as the central repository for genomic and genetic information for the soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. The resource has evolved from its beginnings as a database housing the genomic sequence and genetic and physical maps of a single species, and now represents the breadth and diversity of nematode research, currently serving genome sequence and annotation for around 20 nematodes. In this article, we focus on WormBase's role of genome sequence annotation, describing how we annotate and integrate data from a growing collection of nematode species and strains. We also review our approaches to sequence curation, and discuss the impact on annotation quality of large functional genomics projects such as modENCODE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.