ArticleThe Yale journal of biology and medicine2013
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a comprehensive view.
Article in The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Citizens' Attitudes, Knowledge, and Educational Needs in the Field of Omics Sciences: A Systematic Literature Review.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Pooled it
- Genetic Screening-Emerging Issues.Genes · 2024Review
- Validation of the "Perceptions Regarding pRE-Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease Screening" (PRE-ADS) Questionnaire in the German Population: Attitudes, Motivations, and Barriers to Pre-Symptomatic Dementia Screening.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2024Article
- On the determinants and the role of the payers in the uptake of genetic testing and data sharing in personalized health.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Postgraduate training in Cancer Genetics-a cross-specialty survey exploring experience of clinicians in Ireland.Irish journal of medical science · 2022Article
- Citizens' Literacy in Genomics: A Delphi Survey of Multidisciplinary Experts in the Field.Genes · 2022Article
- Development of a Microneedle Swab for Acquisition of Genomic DNA From Buccal Cells.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Medicalizing risk: How experts and consumers manage uncertainty in genetic health testing.PloS one · 2022Article
- Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing in Korea: Current Status and Significance in Clinical Nutrition.Clinical nutrition research · 2021Review
- Precision Medicine and Public Health: New Challenges for Effective and Sustainable Health.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Pygmalion in the Genes? On the potentially negative impacts of polygenic scores for educational attainment.Social psychology of education : an international journal · 2021Article
- Humanizing Big Data: Recognizing the Human Aspect of Big Data.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Value of Collaboration among Multi-Domain Experts in Analysis of High-Throughput Genomics Data.Cancer research · 2019Review
- Data Work: Meaning-Making in the Era of Data-Rich Medicine.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- "I would rather have it done by a doctor"-laypeople's perceptions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) and its ethical implications.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2019Article
- Opportunities and challenges of integrating genetics education about human diversity into public health nurses' responsibilities in Japan.BMC nursing · 2019Article
- The genetic basis of disease.Essays in biochemistry · 2018Review
- Personal Genome Project UK (PGP-UK): a research and citizen science hybrid project in support of personalized medicine.BMC medical genomics · 2018Article
- The 10th Oxbridge varsity medical ethics debate-should we fear the rise of direct-to-consumer genetic testing?Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2018Article
- Breast Cancer Genetics Knowledge and Testing Intentions among Nigerian Professional Women.Journal of genetic counseling · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing refers to testing sold directly to consumers via the Internet, television, or other marketing venues without involving health care professionals. As the recent Supreme Court ruling eliminated the patentability of human genes, this rapidly evolving segment in the laboratory testing industry is starting to attract increasing scrutiny by government, scientists, consumers, and other interested parties. This article provides a panoramic view of the DTC genetic testing industry, including reasons for seeking DTC testing services, benefits and concerns associated with the industry, and potential development and prospects of this relatively new market under the current regulatory environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24058310PMC3767220What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.