Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24058309›Full record

ReviewThe Yale journal of biology and medicine2013

Strategies for dealing with missing data in clinical trials: from design to analysis.

James D Dziura, Lori A Post, Qing Zhao, Zhixuan Fu, Peter Peduzzi

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 165 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
165citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02885701 nacompletednot on this map

A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study of Splinting After Mini-Open Carpal Tunnel Release

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnthony L. LogliRan2010 to 2015Enrolled249ConditionsCarpal Tunnel SyndromeArmsNo Splint, Removable Splint, Non-removable Splint
NCT03127280 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Can Investigators Reduce Urinary Catheter Use and Lower Urinary Tract Infection Among Women Undergoing Benign Gynecologic Surgery?

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Christ HospitalRan2014 to 2018Enrolled200ConditionsUrinary Tract Infections, Urinary Retention, SatisfactionArmsFast Track foley removal
NCT07369115 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. / "A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Single Site Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Lumateperone for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Early Life Trauma in Adult Patients Aged 21 to 70 Years

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Texas at AustinRan2026 to 2030Enrolled50ConditionsMajor Depressive Diorder, Early Life TraumaArmsLumateperone 42 mg, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

165 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of interventions for the management of sleep disturbances in patients with long COVID: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Surgical interventions for lamellar macular holes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Noninvasive Evaluation of Prolonged-Release Pirfenidone in Compensated Liver Cirrhosis. ODISEA Study, a Randomised Trial.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

James D DziuraDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut ; Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, New Haven, Connecticut.
Lori A Post
Qing Zhao
Zhixuan Fu
Peter Peduzzi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Randomized clinical trials are the gold standard for evaluating interventions as randomized assignment equalizes known and unknown characteristics between intervention groups. However, when participants miss visits, the ability to conduct an intent-to-treat analysis and draw conclusions about a causal link is compromised. As guidance to those performing clinical trials, this review is a non-technical overview of the consequences of missing data and a prescription for its treatment beyond the typical analytic approaches to the entire research process. Examples of bias from incorrect analysis with missing data and discussion of the advantages/disadvantages of analytic methods are given. As no single analysis is definitive when missing data occurs, strategies for its prevention throughout the course of a trial are presented. We aim to convey an appreciation for how missing data influences results and an understanding of the need for careful consideration of missing data during the design, planning, conduct, and analytic stages.

Indexed as

BiasClinical Trials as TopicHumansResearch Designclinical trialintent to treatMARMCARmissing dataMNARstudy design

Identifiers

PMID24058309
PMCPMC3767219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.