Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24058137›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2013

The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the subcommittee on neurobiology.

Fiona Stapleton, Carl Marfurt, Blanka Golebiowski, Mark Rosenblatt, David Bereiter, Carolyn Begley, Darlene Dartt, Juana Gallar, Carlos Belmonte, Pedram Hamrah and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05745220 (Corneal Sensitivity in Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Wear), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05745220 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Corneal Sensitivity in Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Wear

TypeinterventionalSponsorDaniela NoschRan2023 to 2023Enrolled42ConditionsCorneaArmsDevice: silicone hydrogel contact lens
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Tear aqueous production rate between symptomatic and asymptomatic soft contact lens wearers.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Ocular Surface Immune Cell Profiles in Contact Lens-Induced Discomfort.Translational vision science & technology · 2022
    Article
  13. Working principle and relevant physical properties of the Swiss Liquid Jet Aesthesiometer for Corneal Sensitivity (SLACS) evaluation.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2022
    Article
  14. Immunity and pain in the eye: focus on the ocular surface.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. The Human Tissue-Engineered Cornea (hTEC): Recent Progress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Role of TRPM8 Channels in Altered Cold Sensitivity of Corneal Primary Sensory Neurons Induced by Axonal Damage.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Corneal pain and experimental model development.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Fiona StapletonSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Carl Marfurt
Blanka Golebiowski
Mark Rosenblatt
David Bereiter
Carolyn Begley
Darlene Dartt
Juana Gallar
Carlos Belmonte
Pedram Hamrah
Mark Willcox
TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort
UNSW Sydney · AUConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESCornell University · USIndiana University Bloomington · USIndiana University School of MedicineMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Conjunctival Goblet Cell Mucin Secretion in Inflammation and Its ResolutionR01EY019470 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI DARTT, DARLENE A · 2009 to 2023
$7.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report characterizes the neurobiology of the ocular surface and highlights relevant mechanisms that may underpin contact lens-related discomfort. While there is limited evidence for the mechanisms involved in contact lens-related discomfort, neurobiological mechanisms in dry eye disease, the inflammatory pathway, the effect of hyperosmolarity on ocular surface nociceptors, and subsequent sensory processing of ocular pain and discomfort have been at least partly elucidated and are presented herein to provide insight in this new arena. The stimulus to the ocular surface from a contact lens is likely to be complex and multifactorial, including components of osmolarity, solution effects, desiccation, thermal effects, inflammation, friction, and mechanical stimulation. Sensory input will arise from stimulation of the lid margin, palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva, and the cornea.

Indexed as

Contact LensesEye DiseasesFocus GroupsHumansNeurobiologycontact lensdiscomfortdry eyeneurobiology

Identifiers

PMID24058137
PMCPMC5963174
OpenAlexW833016698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.