Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24058058›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2013

Exploring variation-aware contig graphs for (comparative) metagenomics using MaryGold.

Jurgen F Nijkamp, Mihai Pop, Marcel J T Reinders, Dick de Ridder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparative metagenomics using pan-metagenomic graphs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. KOMB: K-core based de novo characterization of copy number variation in microbiomes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  5. Metagenome SNP calling via read-colored de Bruijn graphs.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Metagenomic Assembly: Overview, Challenges and Applications.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jurgen F NijkampDepartment of Intelligent Systems, The Delft Bioinformatics Lab, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands, Kluyver Centre for Genomics of Industrial Fermentation, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands and Department of Computer Science, Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Mihai Pop
Marcel J T Reinders
Dick de Ridder

Funding

Algorithms and Software for the Assembly of Metagenomic DataR01AI100947 · NIAID · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI POP, MIHAI · 2013 to 2025
$7.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI100947
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationAlthough many tools are available to study variation and its impact in single genomes, there is a lack of algorithms for finding such variation in metagenomes. This hampers the interpretation of metagenomics sequencing datasets, which are increasingly acquired in research on the (human) microbiome, in environmental studies and in the study of processes in the production of foods and beverages. Existing algorithms often depend on the use of reference genomes, which pose a problem when a metagenome of a priori unknown strain composition is studied. In this article, we develop a method to perform reference-free detection and visual exploration of genomic variation, both within a single metagenome and between metagenomes.

resultsWe present the MaryGold algorithm and its implementation, which efficiently detects bubble structures in contig graphs using graph decomposition. These bubbles represent variable genomic regions in closely related strains in metagenomic samples. The variation found is presented in a condensed Circos-based visualization, which allows for easy exploration and interpretation of the found variation. We validated the algorithm on two simulated datasets containing three respectively seven Escherichia coli genomes and showed that finding allelic variation in these genomes improves assemblies. Additionally, we applied MaryGold to publicly available real metagenomic datasets, enabling us to find within-sample genomic variation in the metagenomes of a kimchi fermentation process, the microbiome of a premature infant and in microbial communities living on acid mine drainage. Moreover, we used MaryGold for between-sample variation detection and exploration by comparing sequencing data sampled at different time points for both of these datasets. AVAILABILITY: MaryGold has been written in C++ and Python and can be downloaded from http://bioinformatics.tudelft.nl/software

Indexed as

AlgorithmsContig MappingGenetic VariationAllelesHumansInfantMetagenomeMetagenomicsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID24058058
PMCPMC3916741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.