SynthesisCurrent cardiology reports2013
Home blood pressure monitoring is better predictor of cardiovascular disease and target organ damage than office blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Current cardiology reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applying behavior change theory to intervention design: promoting clinic-level implementation of self-measured blood pressure monitoring in safety net primary care settings.Translational behavioral medicine · 2026Trial
- Improved home BP profile with dapagliflozin is associated with amelioration of albuminuria in Japanese patients with diabetic nephropathy: the Yokohama add-on inhibitory efficacy of dapagliflozin on albuminuria in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes study (Y-AIDA study).Cardiovascular diabetology · 2019Trial
- Adopting self-measured blood pressure monitoring in underserved primary care settings: a qualitative study using customer discovery and value proposition principles.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- The Treatment Response and Safety Profile for Mirabegron in Women With Overactive Bladder and Hypertension.Cureus · 2025Article
- Championing Hypertension Remote Monitoring for Equity and Dissemination (CHARMED): A multi-site factorial randomized controlled trial protocol.Contemporary clinical trials · 2025Article
- Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring in Primary Care: Retrospective Analysis from a Large US Healthcare System.Clinical epidemiology · 2025Article
- The Health and Economic Impact of Expanding Home Blood Pressure Monitoring.American journal of preventive medicine · 2023Article
- Peak home blood pressure: new heights for SMBP.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023Article
- Impact of continued high blood pressure on the progression of diabetic nephropathy after 10 years: KAMOGAWA-HBP study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023Article
- Prediction and prevention of preeclampsia in women with preexisting diabetes: the role of home blood pressure, physical activity, and aspirin.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Use of Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring to Improve Hypertension Equity.Current hypertension reports · 2022Review
- Insights on home blood pressure monitoring in Asia: Expert perspectives from 10 countries/regions.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2021Review
- The Road to Implementing Home Blood Pressure Monitoring: Are We There Yet?American journal of hypertension · 2020Article
- Management of Hypertension in the Digital Era: Small Wearable Monitoring Devices for Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2020Review
- Association of maternal home blood pressure trajectory during pregnancy with infant birth weight: the BOSHI study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020Article
- Clinical applications for out-of-office blood pressure monitoring.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2020Review
- Implementing Home Blood Pressure Monitoring into Clinical Practice.Current hypertension reports · 2019Review
- Connected Health in Hypertension Management.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2019Review
- Blood pressure targets for hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes.Annals of translational medicine · 2018Article
- Setting and Method of Measurement Affect Blood Pressure Readings in Older Veterans.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The available, albeit rare, evidence indicates the superiority of home- over office blood pressure monitoring (HBPM vs OBP) to predict cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. We performed a systematic review to update the efficacy of HBPM vs OBP as predictors of all-cause mortality, CV death, and target organ damage. Two reviewers independently performed the literature search in various databases. A meta-analysis with a fixed-effect model was conducted, and the heterogeneity and inconsistency indices were assessed. The search identified 291 articles, of which 10 were eligible for inclusion in the study, and five articles published in 2012 were included in the meta-analysis. A previous meta-analysis showed the superiority of HBPM over OBP to predict all-cause mortality, CV mortality, and CV events. The meta-analysis of articles published in 2012 identified that HBPM was also a better predictor of proteinuria than OBP. In conclusion, the results of our systematic review and meta-analysis confirm that HBPM is a better predictor of CV outcomes and target organ damage than OBP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.