Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24057836›Full record

SynthesisCurrent cardiology reports2013

Home blood pressure monitoring is better predictor of cardiovascular disease and target organ damage than office blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sandra C Fuchs, Renato G B de Mello, Felipe C Fuchs

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current cardiology reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Peak home blood pressure: new heights for SMBP.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Article
  9. Impact of continued high blood pressure on the progression of diabetic nephropathy after 10 years: KAMOGAWA-HBP study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Association of maternal home blood pressure trajectory during pregnancy with infant birth weight: the BOSHI study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020
    Article
  16. Clinical applications for out-of-office blood pressure monitoring.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Connected Health in Hypertension Management.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Setting and Method of Measurement Affect Blood Pressure Readings in Older Veterans.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandra C FuchsDivision of Cardiology and the National Institute for Science and Technology for Health Technology Assessment (IATS/CNPq), Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, 5º andar, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, R. Ramiro Barcellos, 2350, 90.035-903, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, scfuchs@terra.com.br.
Renato G B de Mello
Felipe C Fuchs
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The available, albeit rare, evidence indicates the superiority of home- over office blood pressure monitoring (HBPM vs OBP) to predict cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. We performed a systematic review to update the efficacy of HBPM vs OBP as predictors of all-cause mortality, CV death, and target organ damage. Two reviewers independently performed the literature search in various databases. A meta-analysis with a fixed-effect model was conducted, and the heterogeneity and inconsistency indices were assessed. The search identified 291 articles, of which 10 were eligible for inclusion in the study, and five articles published in 2012 were included in the meta-analysis. A previous meta-analysis showed the superiority of HBPM over OBP to predict all-cause mortality, CV mortality, and CV events. The meta-analysis of articles published in 2012 identified that HBPM was also a better predictor of proteinuria than OBP. In conclusion, the results of our systematic review and meta-analysis confirm that HBPM is a better predictor of CV outcomes and target organ damage than OBP.

Indexed as

Blood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryOffice VisitsAgedBlood Pressure DeterminationCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansHypertensionKidney Function TestsMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePredictive Value of TestsProteinuria

Identifiers

PMID24057836
OpenAlexW2018082921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.