Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24057110›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2014

Diagnostic accuracy of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein for predicting bacteremia/clinical sepsis in children with febrile neutropenia: comparison with interleukin-6, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein.

Lidija Kitanovski, Janez Jazbec, Sergej Hojker, Metka Derganc

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Role of biomarkers in pediatric sepsis: What evidence says?World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biomarkers of sepsis: time for a reappraisal.Critical care (London, England) · 2020
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Predictive value of PCT and IL-6 for bacterial infection in children with cancer and febrile neutropenia.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. C-reactive protein and the MASCC risk index identify high-risk patients with febrile neutropenia and hematologic neoplasms.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2015
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Use of biomarkers in pediatric sepsis: literature review.Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lidija KitanovskiDivision of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia, lidija.kitanovski@kclj.si.
Janez Jazbec
Sergej Hojker
Metka Derganc
Ljubljana University Medical Centre · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn febrile neutropenia (FN), no reliable marker has been identified to discriminate between severe infection and other causes of fever early in the clinical course. Since lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) has proven to be an accurate biomarker of bacteremia/clinical sepsis in critically ill non-immunocompromised infants and children, we performed a prospective study to determine the diagnostic accuracy of LBP in children with FN.

methodsConcentrations of LBP, procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were prospectively measured on two consecutive days in 90 FN episodes experienced by 47 children. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed for each biomarker to predict bacteremia/clinical sepsis and severe sepsis.

resultsEighteen of the 90 episodes were classified as bacteremia/clinical sepsis. On both days 1 and 2, all biomarkers had a low to intermediate diagnostic accuracy for sepsis, and no significant differences were found between them (area under the curve (AUC) for LBP, 0.648 and 0.714; for PCT, 0.665 and 0.744; for IL-6, 0.775 and 0.775; and for CRP, 0.695 and 0.828). Comparison of their AUCs to the AUC of maximum body temperature on admission (AUC = 0.668) also failed to show any significant differences. In severe sepsis, however, the best diagnostic accuracies were found for IL-6 and PCT (AUC 0.892 and 0.752, respectively), and these were significantly higher than those for LBP (AUC 0.566) on admission.

conclusionsOn admission and 24 h later, the LBP concentration is less accurate for predicting bacteremia/clinical sepsis compared to IL-6, PCT, and CRP.

Indexed as

Acute-Phase ProteinsBacteremiaBiomarkersCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCarrier ProteinsChildChild, PreschoolC-Reactive ProteinFebrile NeutropeniaFemaleHumansInfantInterleukin-6Lipopolysaccharide-Binding ProteinMaleAcute-Phase ProteinsBiomarkersCALCA protein, humanCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCarrier ProteinsC-Reactive ProteinInterleukin-6Lipopolysaccharide-Binding ProteinMembrane GlycoproteinsProtein Precursors

Identifiers

PMID24057110
OpenAlexW1983761136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.