Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24057099›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2014

Analysis of 101 patients with severe to profound sudden unilateral hearing loss treated with explorative tympanotomy and sealing of the round window membrane.

Daniel Kampfner, Andreas Anagiotos, Jan Christoffer Luers, Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink, Simon F Preuss

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prognostic factors regarding the hearing outcome in severe to profound sudden sensorineural hearing loss treated by tympanotomy and sealing of labyrinthine windows after ineffective systemic corticosteroid application.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2018
    Article
  6. Inpatient treatment of patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a population-based healthcare research study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2018
    Article
  7. Predictors of hearing recovery in patients with severe sudden sensorineural hearing loss.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2017
    Article
  8. Diagnostics and therapy of sudden hearing loss.GMS current topics in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel KampfnerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, d.kampfner@rfk.landeskrankenhaus.de.
Andreas Anagiotos
Jan Christoffer Luers
Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink
Simon F Preuss
University Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of sealing of the round window membrane in patients with severe to profound unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). 101 Patients with unilateral SSNHL were treated with tympanotomy and sealing of the round window membrane if hearing did not improve after conservative treatment. Preoperative and postoperative pure tone audiograms after removal of the ear packing were evaluated. A 4-PTA (pure tone audiometry) was used as reference value. The improvement of 4-PTA was analysed; in addition, recovery was evaluated using Siegel's criteria. Mean initial hearing threshold was 101.1 dB. Eighty-one patients had a hearing threshold of 80 dB or more. The average improvement at the time of ear packing was 21.7 dB and a further average recovery of 13.4 dB was recorded in the follow-up. Patients who underwent rapid tympanotomy within 5 days showed a significantly better hearing improvement than patients with delayed tympanotomy (26.9 vs. 14.0 dB, p < 0.02). Age was significantly correlated with the degree of hearing improvement. There was no significant difference of recovery between patients with detected lesions of the round window membrane and those without. Concomitant vertigo and tinnitus showed no significant effect on recovery. Tympanotomy and sealing of the round window membrane is effective in the treatment of severe to profound SSNHL. There is evidence that early surgery performed within 5 days is more effective than later surgery. The existence of a detectable lesion of the round window membrane has no significant influence on recovery.

Indexed as

Hearing Loss, SuddenHearing Loss, UnilateralAudiometry, Pure-ToneFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMiddle Ear VentilationPostoperative CareRecovery of FunctionRetrospective StudiesRound Window, EarSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24057099
OpenAlexW2039584672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.