Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24056814›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2014

Response endpoints and failure-free survival after initial treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease.

Yoshihiro Inamoto, Paul J Martin, Barry E Storer, Marco Mielcarek, Rainer F Storb, Paul A Carpenter

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshihiro Inamotopcarpent@fhcrc.org.
Paul J Martin
Barry E Storer
Marco Mielcarek
Rainer F Storb
Paul A Carpenter
University of Washington · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Marian Esvelt · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
VIRUS-MEDIATED MYELOSUPPRESSIONP01CA018029 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Geoffrey Roger HILL · 1985 to 2026
$128.4M
Project 3: Stem Cell Allografts for Lymphoid MalignanciesP01CA078902 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI SANDMAIER, BRENDA MARIE · 1999 to 2025
$46.1M
UNRELATED AND HLA-MISMATCHED RELATED DONOR TRANSPLANTSP01HL036444 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI RAWLINGS, DAVID J · 1986 to 2010
$25.9M
Statins for Prevention of GVHDR01HL108307 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MIELCAREK, MARCO B · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA15704NCI NIH HHS CA18029NCI NIH HHS CA78902NCI NIH HHS P01 CA018029NCI NIH HHS P01 CA078902NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NHLBI NIH HHS HL108307NHLBI NIH HHS HL36444NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL036444NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL108307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated short-term response endpoints for acute graft-versus-host disease treatment trials. We postulated that response endpoints should correlate with reduced symptom burden and decreased subsequent treatment failure, defined as non-relapse mortality, recurrent malignancy, or additional systemic treatment. The cohort included 303 consecutive patients who received initial systemic steroid treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease. Response was evaluated at day 28 after initial treatment, which in all cases preceded the onset of chronic graft-versus-host disease. At day 28, 36% of patients had a complete response, 26% had a very good partial response, 10% had another degree of partial response (other partial response) and 28% had no response. As expected, the symptom burden was lower in patients with very good partial response compared to those with other partial response. The frequencies of subsequent treatment failure were similar in patients with complete and very good partial responses, but lower than in patients with other partial response or no response at day 28. The frequency of second-line treatment was lower in patients with very good partial response than in those with other partial response. Risk factors associated with a lower probability of complete or very good partial response at day 28 were unrelated or human leukocyte antigen-mismatched related donor grafts and liver or gastrointestinal involvement at onset of initial treatment. Taken together, these results suggest that endpoints in acute graft-versus-host disease treatment trials should distinguish between very good partial response and other partial response. Our results support the use of complete or very good partial response at day 28 as an appropriate short-term primary endpoint.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseAdolescentAgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24056814
PMCPMC3912972
OpenAlexW2026269966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.